abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfiltergenderglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptwitteruniversalityweb

這頁面沒有繁體中文版本,現以English顯示

內容有以下的語言版本: English, 日本語

文章

2024年4月10日

作者:
Danish Institute for Human Rights

New report: Danish Institute for Human Rights advises development finance institutions to strengthen human rights risk management systems

"Report: Development finance institutions should strengthen their human rights risk management systems for intermediated finance"

A report by the Danish Institute for Human Rights explains why development finance institutions should strengthen their human rights risk management systems for intermediated finance.

Development Finance Institutions have traditionally provided financing directly to projects in diverse sectors such as infrastructure, energy, education across developing economies – this is referred to as direct finance. Since the early 2000s, Development Finance Institutions have increasingly turned to indirect or intermediated finance - financing through financial intermediaries such as commercial banks and investment funds.

In a new report the Danish Institute for Human Rights assesses whether Development Finance Institutions´ policies for the management of environmental and social risks in intermediated finance can effectively prevent and address negative human rights impacts.

The report identifies various gaps in the Development Finance Institutions´ policies and procedures against the expectations set out in the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (UNGPs). Specifically, the Report uncovers three areas of concern in respect to the (i) the scope of application of Development Finance Institutions´ policies to intermediated finance operations and transactions, (ii) the quality and adequacy of the Development Finance Institutions´ management of environmental and social risks; and (iii) barriers to remedy for those potentially and actually affected by financial intermediaries financing. [...]

The report concludes that Development Finance Institutions' policies, historically developed for direct finance operations, need various upgrades to better reflect the complexities and specificities of intermediated finance. The report also offers concrete suggestions and recommendations to Development Finance Institutions and other stakeholders to address some of the most obvious gaps identified.

The report will be primarily relevant for Development Finance Institutions, international and national policy makers, as well as CSOs and academics working at the intersection of human rights and development finance.