‘All that is missing is a whip’: Home Office ignored migrant worker abuses on farms
摘要
日期: 2023年10月22日
地點: 英國
其他
Not Reported ( Labour supplier ) - Labour Supplier , Not Reported ( 農業/食品/飲料/煙草/漁業:綜合 ) - Other Value Chain Entity受影響的
受影響的總人數: 數字未知
移民和移民工人: ( 數字未知 - 烏克蘭 , 農業/食品/飲料/煙草/漁業:綜合 , Gender not reported )議題
藥物可及性 , 食物權回應
Response sought: 否
資訊來源: News outlet
摘要
日期: 2023年10月22日
地點: 英國
其他
Not Reported ( 農業/食品/飲料/煙草/漁業:綜合 ) - Other Value Chain Entity , Not Reported ( Labour supplier ) - Labour Supplier受影響的
受影響的總人數: 1
移民和移民工人: ( 數字未知 - 巴巴多斯 , 農業/食品/飲料/煙草/漁業:綜合 , Gender not reported )議題
懷孕歧視 , Precarious/Unsuitable Living Conditions回應
Response sought: 否
資訊來源: News outlet
摘要
日期: 2023年10月22日
地點: 英國
其他
Not Reported ( 農業/食品/飲料/煙草/漁業:綜合 ) - Other Value Chain Entity , Not Reported ( Labour supplier ) - Labour Supplier受影響的
受影響的總人數: 12
移民和移民工人: ( 數字未知 - 地點未知 , 農業/食品/飲料/煙草/漁業:綜合 , Gender not reported )議題
種族/民族/階層/出身歧視 , Access to Non-Judicial Remedy回應
Response sought: 否
資訊來源: News outlet
摘要
日期: 2023年10月22日
地點: 英國
其他
Not Reported ( 農業/食品/飲料/煙草/漁業:綜合 ) - Other Value Chain Entity , Not Reported ( Labour supplier ) - Labour Supplier受影響的
受影響的總人數: 數字未知
移民和移民工人: ( 1 - 地點未知 , 農業/食品/飲料/煙草/漁業:綜合 , Gender not reported )議題
Poverty Wages , Denial of leave , Reasonable Working Hours & Leisure Time , Irregular Work , 水的獲取回應
Response sought: 否
資訊來源: News outlet
摘要
日期: 2023年10月22日
地點: 英國
企業
Fruitful Jobs - Labour Supplier , Haygrove - Employer受影響的
受影響的總人數: 數字未知
移民和移民工人: ( 數字未知 - 玻利維亞 , 農業/食品/飲料/煙草/漁業:綜合 , Women , Documented migrants ) , 移民和移民工人: ( 數字未知 - 玻利維亞 , 農業和畜牧 , Men , Documented migrants ) , 移民和移民工人: ( 數字未知 - 智利 , 農業和畜牧 , Gender not reported , Documented migrants )議題
Irregular Work , Contract Substitution , Reasonable Working Hours & Leisure Time , Wage Theft , 恐嚇和威脅 , 毆打和暴力 , 剝奪言論自由 , Dismissal , 歧視/多元文化:綜合 , Harassment (other than sexual) , 水的獲取 , Poverty Wages , Access to Non-Judicial Remedy , 性別歧視 , 招聘費用 , Debt Bondage , 訊息獲取 , Minimum Wage , 強迫勞動與當代奴隸制 , 人口販賣 , 心理健康回應
已邀請回應:是,由Journalists
回應的外部鏈接: (查看更多)
後續行動: The workers held a strike and reported the farm to West Mercia police, which referred the case to the GLAA. TBIJ understands that the GLAA interviewed four workers in late September, two months after the initial complaint had been filed and after dozens of workers had left the farm.Chilean police are also conducting an investigation, and Julia and a colleague are in the process of filing employment tribunal claims in the UK. Fruitful Jobs told TBIJ that transfer requests were related to lower than expected working hours and not to working conditions. It said that Emery was at the farm to try to resolve issues and made his comments because the worker was interrupting. He pointed out that there was a legal obligation on visa sponsors to notify the Home Office of changes to a seasonal worker’s situation. Haygrove rejected all allegations of wrongdoing in the “strongest terms” and said it was not aware of any ongoing investigation. Haygrove told TBIJ the lack of shifts was because of “adverse weather conditions”, but that all workers were paid at least 32 hours a week at minimum wage, with £100 cash advances to new arrivals who didn’t immediately get work. The company also rebutted allegations of modern slavery and labour exploitation, adding that most of its seasonal workers “had a very positive experience”, with an “annual average return rate of 64%”. The company added that it was regularly audited by bodies including the British Retail Consortium, and claimed recent inspections by both the Home Office and Gangmasters and Labour Abuse Authority (GLAA) had found no evidence of wrongdoing. However, TBIJ understands that the Home Office has not finalised its findings and the GLAA told TBIJ that an investigation remains ongoing. In a preliminary ruling, the Home Office has now decided there are reasonable grounds to conclude that Ms Casimiro could have been a victim of modern slavery. Her case will now be investigated further by the government before a final decision is made. In response to the UN letter, Haygrove said the allegations were ‘materially incorrect’ and said it would be paying workers for the time spent travelling between company sites as a “goodwill gesture”. Fruitful jobs refuted the allegations and said it took issues workers experienced at Haygrove seriously.
資訊來源: News outlet
…she was given no shifts or pay during her first week at Haygrove, one of the UK’s biggest fruit producers, in late June…
…allegations of mistreatment such as those at Haygrove are common across many UK farms. There is also evidence that the Home Office knew about the allegations, failed to act on them and then attempted to stop that information from being made public…
[Migrants] … faced far greater levels of exploitation than previously thought. Plus, the government could be in breach of its obligations when it comes to the prevention of modern slavery.
Haygrove told TBIJ the lack of shifts was because of “adverse weather conditions”… The company also rebutted allegations of modern slavery and labour exploitation…
… TBIJ was given access to 19 farm inspection reports produced by the Home Office between 2021 and 2022…
Nearly half (44%) of the 845 workers interviewed as part of the inspections raised welfare issues including racism, wage theft and threats of being sent back home…
… Emery [managing director of Fruitful Jobs] told Julia and her colleagues that if they continued to protest, their visas would be revoked…
Fruitful Jobs told TBIJ that transfer requests were related to lower than expected working hours and not to working conditions…