abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfiltergenderglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptwitteruniversalityweb

這頁面沒有繁體中文版本,現以English顯示

故事

2014年12月2日

BankTrack report finds banks not yet living up to human rights obligations under UN Guiding Principles


In December 2014 BankTrack released a new report titled "Banking with Principles?". The report assesses 32 of the largest global banks against the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights.  Banks were assigned a score of between 0 and 12 depending on their performance against 12 criteria. 

Business & Human Rights Resource Centre contacted the banks that had not replied to BankTrack during the drafting of the report to ask them to respond in December 2014.  

BBVA, Barclays, Morgan Stanley, Wells Fargo, Santander, Citi, Rabobank, Goldman Sachs, Mitsui Sumitomo, Crédit Agricole.  BBVA, Barlcays, Santander, Citi, Rabobank, Mitsui Sumitomo responded.  We did not receive responses from Morgan Stanley, Wells Fargo, Goldman Sachs or Crédit Agricole.

The Resource Centre also invited 4 other companies criticised in the report to respond: Bumi Resources, Tata Power, APRIL and Corriente Resources.  These companies were alleged by BankTrack to be involved in projects that banks should have financed.

 

企業回應

Crédit Agricole 瀏覽回應
高盛

沒有回應

Mitsui Sumitomo Insurance (part of Sumitomo Group) 瀏覽回應
Citigroup 瀏覽回應
Rabobank 瀏覽回應
Santander 瀏覽回應
Santander 瀏覽回應
Morgan Stanley

沒有回應

Wells Fargo

沒有回應

Barclays 瀏覽回應

時間線