abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfiltergenderglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptwitteruniversalityweb

這頁面沒有繁體中文版本,現以English顯示

故事

2024年9月24日

Israel/OPT: Civil society organisations call on the EU to suspend trade agreement with Israel

Since October 2023, the people of Gaza have been facing what the ICJ has determined is a "plausible risk of genocide". In light of the ongoing suffering by the Palestinian people both in Gaza and in the unlawfully occupied West Bank, civil society organisations, EU member states and members of the European Parliament have called for sanctions and a review of the EU-Israel Association Agreement. Since the agreement entered into force in 2000 and created a free trade area, trade between the EU and Israel has increased substantially; today the EU accounts for around 28% of Israel's trade in goods, making it Israel's biggest trading partner.

Critics argue that Israel is not complying with Article 2 of the Agreement which establishes that human rights are an essential element of the Agreement:

“Relations between the Parties, as well as all the provisions of the Agreement itself, shall be based on respect for human rights and democratic principles, which guides their internal and international policy and constitutes an essential element of this Agreement.”

In March and April 2024, 196 civil society organisations, SOMO and the UN Special Rapporteur on the occupied Palestinian territories called on EU decision-makers to suspend the EU-Israel Association Agreement.

In August 2024, Amnesty International also reiterated the need to review whether Israel has violated its obligations under Article 2, emphasising that in light of the recent Advisory Opinion of the International Court of Justice there can be "no business as usual" for the EU and Israel. According to Amnesty International, the ICJ has demonstrated that Spain, Ireland and Slovenia were correct in calling for a review of the EU’s Association Agreement with Israel. This is in view of both the ICJ’s Advisory Opinion and the ICJ’s determination that there is a plausible risk of genocide in Gaza in the case brought against Israel under the Genocide Convention. Member states blocking such a review are acting against the obligations indicated by the ICJ in its Advisory Opinion, argues Amnesty International.

Israel refused the EU's request for an ad-hoc meeting of the EU-Israel Association Council to discuss Israel’s compliance with its human rights obligations and instead wants to convene in the second half of 2024, when Hungary — one of Israel’s biggest allies in the EU — holds the EU presidency and presides over negotiations.

時間線

隱私資訊

本網站使用 cookie 和其他網絡存儲技術。您可以在下方設置您的隱私選項。您所作的更改將立即生效。

有關我們使用網絡儲存技術的更多資訊,請參閱我們的 數據使用和 Cookie 政策

Strictly necessary storage

ON
OFF

Necessary storage enables core site functionality. This site cannot function without it, so it can only be disabled by changing settings in your browser.

分析cookie

ON
OFF

您瀏覽本網頁時我們將以Google Analytics收集信息。接受此cookie將有助我們理解您的瀏覽資訊,並協助我們改善呈現資訊的方法。所有分析資訊都以匿名方式收集,我們並不能用相關資訊得到您的個人信息。谷歌在所有主要瀏覽器中都提供退出Google Analytics的添加應用程式。

市場營銷cookies

ON
OFF

我們從第三方網站獲得企業責任資訊,當中包括社交媒體和搜尋引擎。這些cookie協助我們理解相關瀏覽數據。

您在此網站上的隱私選項

本網站使用 cookie 和其他網絡儲存技術來增強您在必要核心功能之外的體驗。