abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfiltergenderglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptwitteruniversalityweb

這頁面沒有繁體中文版本,現以English顯示

文章

2025年2月4日

作者:
Heidi Hautala and Phil Bloomer, Reuters

Comment | Why Europe must hold its nerve on raising the ESG bar for business

"Comment: Why Europe must hold its nerve on raising the ESG bar for business," 4 February 2025

With the inauguration of President Donald Trump, and his agenda of narrow economic nationalism, Europe faces hard choices. The new U.S. president inevitably emboldens similar voices in Europe too. Together they stoke fears that Europe’s economies are uncompetitive and ossified, about to be run over by the “animal spirits” unleashed in the U.S. by blanket deregulation, arbitrary tariffs and convenient myopia on our ecological crisis.[...]

Commissioner Ursula von der Leyen made a serious concession to corporate lobbies in November with an “omnibus” package [...]

The new regulation, which is now denounced as a “bureaucratic burden” despite its emphasis on smart and focused action, is there to create trust that companies can be a force for not only profitability but also for good. If we now abandon these principles, we abandon them at our peril as public trust erodes.

It is vital to gain the trust of citizens and consumers that the products and services they buy do not originate from child labour or the reckless destruction of the environment. To dismantle laws, or even fall back on discredited voluntary guidelines, would be a betrayal of citizens’ legitimate expectations of governments to direct markets towards shared prosperity and the common good. Another element of trust is that companies have the right to expect legal certainty and predictability from lawmakers.[...]

The views of responsible companies that have called for mandatory rules instead of failing certifications should be heeded. A coalition of companies, including Unilever, Nestle and Mars state that opening the legislation could undermine investment.[...]

More than 150 business and human rights professionals wrote to the commission counselling against opening the primary legislation.[...] Similarly, 170 civil society organisations have appealed that “the EU should not undo the progress that has already been achieved”[...]

After years of an assertive Brussels Effect (in which many smart European standards have been adopted by business worldwide), it would signal a loss of confidence, leadership and direction. Thus the omnibus initiative, if pursued, needs to be confirmed as a limited effort to strengthen further the guidance for the excellent social and environmental regulations now enshrined in European legislation.

屬於以下案件的一部分

EU: Development & implementation of the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD)

EU Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive: Transposition & 'Omnibus' Updates

隱私資訊

本網站使用 cookie 和其他網絡存儲技術。您可以在下方設置您的隱私選項。您所作的更改將立即生效。

有關我們使用網絡儲存技術的更多資訊,請參閱我們的 數據使用和 Cookie 政策

Strictly necessary storage

ON
OFF

Necessary storage enables core site functionality. This site cannot function without it, so it can only be disabled by changing settings in your browser.

分析cookie

ON
OFF

您瀏覽本網頁時我們將以Google Analytics收集信息。接受此cookie將有助我們理解您的瀏覽資訊,並協助我們改善呈現資訊的方法。所有分析資訊都以匿名方式收集,我們並不能用相關資訊得到您的個人信息。谷歌在所有主要瀏覽器中都提供退出Google Analytics的添加應用程式。

市場營銷cookies

ON
OFF

我們從第三方網站獲得企業責任資訊,當中包括社交媒體和搜尋引擎。這些cookie協助我們理解相關瀏覽數據。

您在此網站上的隱私選項

本網站使用 cookie 和其他網絡儲存技術來增強您在必要核心功能之外的體驗。