abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeblueskyburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfilterflaggenderglobeglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptwitteruniversalitywebwhatsappxIcons / Social / YouTube

這頁面沒有繁體中文版本,現以English顯示

文章

2021年12月17日

作者:
Trade Justice Movement, BHRRC, Greenpeace UK and 16 others

UK: CSOs raise concerns about Australia trade deal

Tom Fisk

'CSOs raise concerns about Australia deal', 17 December 2021

"Eighteen civil society organisations have today written to Anne-Marie Trevelyan to raise concerns about the UK-Australia Free Trade Agreement that was signed this morning.

The letter raises particular concerns about the likely impact of the deal on climate action - particularly worrying given that the UK retains the COP presidency until the end of next year. Australia is a well-known climate laggard, with serious issues in relation to the clearance of forest for cattle farming and the influence of mining lobbies which has halted progress on climate policy.

Organisations are concerned about the impact of the deal on UK standards, in particular food standards and animal welfare. Chapters on the environment, animal welfare and development are non-binding, unlike the other provisions of the deal.

Organisations welcome the exclusion of ISDS, however the deal still contains an investment chapter with many of the same problematic provisions that can be found in other investment chapters. There is also the risk that the exclusion is rendered meaningless if both countries are covered by the ISDS provisions in the Comprehensive and Progressive Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP).

Finally, the letter calls for a thorough process of public and parliamentary scrutiny. It appears there will be a nine to twelve month window to analyse the deal, which is more than had been anticipated. Organisations hope that the government will use this time to undertake meaningful consultation. However it remains the case that there is no guarantee of a debate or binding vote for parliamentarians..."

時間線

隱私資訊

本網站使用 cookie 和其他網絡存儲技術。您可以在下方設置您的隱私選項。您所作的更改將立即生效。

有關我們使用網絡儲存技術的更多資訊,請參閱我們的 數據使用和 Cookie 政策

Strictly necessary storage

ON
OFF

Necessary storage enables core site functionality. This site cannot function without it, so it can only be disabled by changing settings in your browser.

分析cookie

ON
OFF

您瀏覽本網頁時我們將以Google Analytics收集信息。接受此cookie將有助我們理解您的瀏覽資訊,並協助我們改善呈現資訊的方法。所有分析資訊都以匿名方式收集,我們並不能用相關資訊得到您的個人信息。谷歌在所有主要瀏覽器中都提供退出Google Analytics的添加應用程式。

市場營銷cookies

ON
OFF

我們從第三方網站獲得企業責任資訊,當中包括社交媒體和搜尋引擎。這些cookie協助我們理解相關瀏覽數據。

您在此網站上的隱私選項

本網站使用 cookie 和其他網絡儲存技術來增強您在必要核心功能之外的體驗。