abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfiltergenderglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptwitteruniversalityweb

這頁面沒有繁體中文版本,現以English顯示

文章

2016年8月21日

作者:
Zhang Chun, China Dialogue

Environmental law blunted by crippling court costs

The All China Environmental Federation (ACEF) won its lawsuit against Zhenhua [a glass-making firm based in Dezhou, Shangdong Province] for its long-standing failure to curb the release of harmful gases such as sulphur dioxide and nitrogen oxide…, [which] made legal history by becoming China’s first public interest action to be brought against air polluters…and ACEF’s action has set a vital precedent for those using those using the courts to fight environmental crime.

…But the NGO’s victory has been accompanied by frustration. The court rejected a request from ACEF for the imposition of punitive damages on Zhenhua Ltd of 7.8 million yuan, and the NGO was forced to cover its own legal expenses amounting to 400,000 yuan. The outcome…highlighted the financial difficulty of prosecuting big, industrial firms, which has led to a rising number of NGOs opting not to pursue legal action...[An expert] said that so far this year only four NGOs have brought public interest lawsuits, down from 11 in 2015…it would be more if it were not for the cost of bringing such cases...

屬於以下案件的一部分

中國首例大氣污染環境公益訴訟案宣判,污染企業被罰2198萬元

中國:成本過高或阻礙環保公益訴訟發展