abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfiltergenderglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptwitteruniversalityweb

這頁面沒有繁體中文版本,現以English顯示

故事

2025年3月28日

Towards an EU Artificial Intelligence Act

In April 2021, the European Commission published a proposal for the EU's first ever legal framework to regulate artificial intelligence. The proposal follows a risk-based approach, whereby AI systems considered a clear threat to the safety, livelihoods and rights of people will be banned, whereas the ones considered as high-risk will be subject to extra scrutiny.

The draft also proposed creating a European Artificial Intelligence Board, comprising one representative per EU country, which will supervise the law’s application and share best practices.

Several civil rights groups welcomed elements of the proposal, such as the ban on social scoring software, but expressed concern that the proposal does not go far enough to mitigate the vast potential for abuse of technologies such as non-live facial recognition systems. A cross-party group of 40 MEPs in the European parliament also called on the Commission to strengthen the proposal to include an outright ban on the use of facial recognition and other forms of biometric surveillance in public places. 163 civil society organisations pointed out in December 2022 that "the EU AI Act does not adequately address and prevent the harms stemming from the use of AI in the migration context."

Based on the Commission's proposal, on 6 December 2022 the Council adopted its General Approach. Civil rights group heavily criticised the changes made, for example, the increase of exemptions for AI-uses in law enforcement, migration, asylum and border control and the weakening of the restrictions on remote biometric identification. Furthermore, the approach proposes a national security exemption, meaning intrusive AI-based technologies could be used with no special limitations or safeguards.

In June 2023, the European Parliament adopted its official position adding key protections for fundamental rights to the Commission's draft. NGOs welcomed the proposed ban on facial recognition and abusive mass surveillance technology, but criticised that the parliament failed to introduce new provisions which would protect the rights of migrants from discriminatory surveillance.

After all institutions, the Commission, the Council and the Parliament, had adopted their positions, trilogue negotiations between the bodies started.

On 9 December 2023, EU co-legislators reached political agreement on the AI Act, after a negotiation marathon. The new AI rules, considered the world's most comprehensive, present a substantial advance in an extraordinarily dangerous sector that is still mostly unregulated across the globe. The AI Act will provide a range of key safeguards for fundamental rights in the context of AI, including at the workplace, after sustained efforts from civil society and EU Parliamentarians to rebalance the law. The law establishes mandatory fundamental rights impact assessments for AI systems classified as high-risk, extending to sectors like insurance and banking, and also grants citizens the right to file complaints and receive explanations about high risk AI systems’ decisions affecting their rights. However, rights groups caution that crucial technical details are not yet fixed or publicly known, and that serious loopholes remain, including carve-outs for law enforcement, allowing overseas exports of banned technology and a walk-back from banning live facial recognition.

Please see below for more information and civil society reactions.

On 2 February 2024, the ambassadors of the 27 countries of the EU approved the Act, rubber-stamping the political agreement reached in December.

On 13 March 2024, the EU Parliament approved the Act with a large majority.

The AI Act was set to take effect from 2 February. However, according to reporting by Investigate Europe, lobbying by European governments has led to the act being diluted, "giving police and border authorities, among others, greater freedoms to covertly monitor citizens".

In February 2025, it was reported that the European Commission had withdrawn the AI Liability Directive. The decision followed criticisms, including by US Vice President JD Vance, of technology regulation at Paris' AI Action Summit. Criticism of the AI Liability Directive had allegedly "gained traction" following the adoption of the AI Act (see above) in 2024.

時間線

隱私資訊

本網站使用 cookie 和其他網絡存儲技術。您可以在下方設置您的隱私選項。您所作的更改將立即生效。

有關我們使用網絡儲存技術的更多資訊,請參閱我們的 數據使用和 Cookie 政策

Strictly necessary storage

ON
OFF

Necessary storage enables core site functionality. This site cannot function without it, so it can only be disabled by changing settings in your browser.

分析cookie

ON
OFF

您瀏覽本網頁時我們將以Google Analytics收集信息。接受此cookie將有助我們理解您的瀏覽資訊,並協助我們改善呈現資訊的方法。所有分析資訊都以匿名方式收集,我們並不能用相關資訊得到您的個人信息。谷歌在所有主要瀏覽器中都提供退出Google Analytics的添加應用程式。

市場營銷cookies

ON
OFF

我們從第三方網站獲得企業責任資訊,當中包括社交媒體和搜尋引擎。這些cookie協助我們理解相關瀏覽數據。

您在此網站上的隱私選項

本網站使用 cookie 和其他網絡儲存技術來增強您在必要核心功能之外的體驗。