abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfiltergenderglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptwitteruniversalityweb

這頁面沒有繁體中文版本,現以English顯示

文章

2023年11月27日

作者:
Anti-Slavery International & 17 others

EU: CSOs and trade unions urge Council to speed up negotiations to adopt a General Approach on proposed EU Forced Labour Regulation

"General Approach on the proposed EU Forced Labour Regulation",

We are writing on behalf of the undersigned civil society organisations and trade unions to urge the Council to speed up negotiations to adopt a General Approach on the proposed EU Forced Labour Regulation (FLR) in line with the core elements outlined below...

To maximise opportunities for the legislation to be approved before the end of the mandate of the current European Parliament and European Commission, it is now of utmost importance that, during the Spanish Presidency, also the Council agrees on a General Approach.

On the content of the Council’s General Approach, we strongly request that the following central elements be included.

  1. An evidentiary regime adapted to forced labour: Both the European Commission and European Parliament have proposed the requirement of a high level of evidence to initiate an investigation (“substantiated concern” or “well-founded reason”). The level of proof required to initiate an investigation should be lowered, taking into consideration the barriers to provide evidence experienced by victims of forced labour, who may not have access to all relevant documentation that may be required during proceedings...
  2. State-imposed forced labour: In cases of state-imposed forced labour, the Commission’s proposal did not outline any adequate investigative or enforcement mechanism, making it impractical and difficult to investigate and ascertain such cases...
  3. One-stop shop EU-wide complaints mechanism: The Commission’s proposal put forward a highly decentralised investigation and enforcement system based on 27 national authorities. Such a mechanism would be particularly difficult to access and navigate for victims or survivors of forced labour and those assisting them, who have no easy way to know to which of the authorities of the 27 member states they should send their complaint or submit information...
  4. Remediation: The goal of any such regulation should be remediation for workers who have experienced forced labour. We strongly support the relevant amendments made by the European Parliament to the Commission’s proposal...

時間線

隱私資訊

本網站使用 cookie 和其他網絡存儲技術。您可以在下方設置您的隱私選項。您所作的更改將立即生效。

有關我們使用網絡儲存技術的更多資訊,請參閱我們的 數據使用和 Cookie 政策

Strictly necessary storage

ON
OFF

Necessary storage enables core site functionality. This site cannot function without it, so it can only be disabled by changing settings in your browser.

分析cookie

ON
OFF

您瀏覽本網頁時我們將以Google Analytics收集信息。接受此cookie將有助我們理解您的瀏覽資訊,並協助我們改善呈現資訊的方法。所有分析資訊都以匿名方式收集,我們並不能用相關資訊得到您的個人信息。谷歌在所有主要瀏覽器中都提供退出Google Analytics的添加應用程式。

市場營銷cookies

ON
OFF

我們從第三方網站獲得企業責任資訊,當中包括社交媒體和搜尋引擎。這些cookie協助我們理解相關瀏覽數據。

您在此網站上的隱私選項

本網站使用 cookie 和其他網絡儲存技術來增強您在必要核心功能之外的體驗。