abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeblueskyburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfilterflaggenderglobeglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptwitteruniversalitywebwhatsappxIcons / Social / YouTube

這頁面沒有繁體中文版本,現以English顯示

文章

2024年2月9日

作者:
Euractiv

German-Italian revolt delays EU’s due diligence law

The Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD) has been taken off the agenda of today’s meeting of EU ambassadors, as it was not expected to reach a majority among EU countries. So far, no new date for the vote has been set.

The law, which aims to make companies liable for breaches of human rights in their value chain, has been contested for some time as critics fear it adds to companies’ bureaucratic burden.

After a last-minute intervention by the German liberal party FDP (Renew), the German government would have had to abstain, as internal coalition rules foresee in the case that coalition parties cannot agree on a joint position – despite both socialist Labour Minister Hubertus Heil and Chancellor Olaf Scholz having liked to see the law greenlighted.

In a letter to business associations, FDP chief Christian Lindner and Justice Minister Marco Buschmann wrote that the law “would place an additional burden on the companies concerned,” vis-a-vis with a similar German law, known as the supply chain act.

If the vote had been taken today, Italy would have abstained as well, according to a diplomatic source. In that case, the law would therefore likely have fallen short of the necessary “qualified” majority of 15 EU countries representing at least 65% of the population.

The decision to take it off the agenda was based on the “probability of reaching a qualified majority”, another diplomat said.

The next steps are unclear, as the upcoming European election means there will be a hard break to any legislative work very soon, as the last meeting of the European Parliament will be in April.

“The FDP has not only persuaded DE to abstain, but has also pressurised other countries,” Anna Cavazzini (Greens/EFA), head of the European Parliament’s Single Market Committee, posted on X, adding “it’s unbelievable how a single party is keeping Europe in suspense”.

“The postponement must now be used to convince wobbly candidate states,” she added. [...]

時間線

隱私資訊

本網站使用 cookie 和其他網絡存儲技術。您可以在下方設置您的隱私選項。您所作的更改將立即生效。

有關我們使用網絡儲存技術的更多資訊,請參閱我們的 數據使用和 Cookie 政策

Strictly necessary storage

ON
OFF

Necessary storage enables core site functionality. This site cannot function without it, so it can only be disabled by changing settings in your browser.

分析cookie

ON
OFF

您瀏覽本網頁時我們將以Google Analytics收集信息。接受此cookie將有助我們理解您的瀏覽資訊,並協助我們改善呈現資訊的方法。所有分析資訊都以匿名方式收集,我們並不能用相關資訊得到您的個人信息。谷歌在所有主要瀏覽器中都提供退出Google Analytics的添加應用程式。

市場營銷cookies

ON
OFF

我們從第三方網站獲得企業責任資訊,當中包括社交媒體和搜尋引擎。這些cookie協助我們理解相關瀏覽數據。

您在此網站上的隱私選項

本網站使用 cookie 和其他網絡儲存技術來增強您在必要核心功能之外的體驗。