Hannaford’s hotline fails farmworkers
摘要
日期: 2023年6月26日
地點: 美國
企業
Ahold Delhaize - Other Value Chain Entity , Hannaford (part of Ahold Delhaize) - Buyer受影響的
受影響的總人數: 數字未知
工人: ( 數字未知 - 地點未知 , 農業和畜牧 , Gender not reported )議題
Precarious/Unsuitable Living Conditions , Occupational Health & Safety , 毆打和暴力 , Harassment (other than sexual) , Dismissal , 恐嚇和威脅回應
已邀請回應:是,由The Resource Centre
載有回應的故事: (查看更多)
後續行動: None reported. The Resource Centre asked Hannaford and its parent company Ahold Delhazie to respond to the allegations. Their response can be read in full.
資訊來源: News outlet
摘要
日期: 2023年6月21日
地點: 美國
企業
Ahold Delhaize - Other Value Chain Entity , Hannaford (part of Ahold Delhaize) - Buyer受影響的
受影響的總人數: 數字未知
工人: ( 數字未知 - 地點未知 , 農業和畜牧 , Gender not reported )議題
Precarious/Unsuitable Living Conditions , Occupational Health & Safety , 恐嚇和威脅回應
已邀請回應:是,由The Resource Centre
載有回應的故事: (查看更多)
後續行動: None reported. The Resource Centre asked Hannaford and its parent company Ahold Delhazie to respond to the allegations. Their response can be read in full.
資訊來源: News outlet
摘要
日期: 2023年6月21日
地點: 美國
企業
Hannaford (part of Ahold Delhaize) - Buyer , Ahold Delhaize - Other Value Chain Entity受影響的
受影響的總人數: 數字未知
工人: ( 數字未知 - 地點未知 , 農業和畜牧 , Gender not reported )議題
童工 , Occupational Health & Safety , Reasonable Working Hours & Leisure Time , Denial of leave , 藥物可及性 , Wage Theft回應
已邀請回應:是,由The Resource Centre
載有回應的故事: (查看更多)
後續行動: None reported. The Resource Centre asked Hannaford and its parent company Ahold Delhazie to respond to the allegations. Their response can be read in full.
資訊來源: News outlet
摘要
日期: 2023年6月21日
地點: 美國
企業
Hannaford (part of Ahold Delhaize) - Buyer , Ahold Delhaize - Other Value Chain Entity受影響的
受影響的總人數: 數字未知
工人: ( 數字未知 - 地點未知 , 農業和畜牧 , Gender not reported )議題
Precarious/Unsuitable Living Conditions , Occupational Health & Safety , 種族/民族/階層/出身歧視回應
已邀請回應:是,由The Resource Centre
載有回應的故事: (查看更多)
後續行動: None reported. The Resource Centre asked Hannaford and its parent company Ahold Delhazie to respond to the allegations. Their response can be read in full.
資訊來源: News outlet
摘要
日期: 2023年6月21日
地點: 美國
企業
Ahold Delhaize - Other Value Chain Entity , Hannaford (part of Ahold Delhaize) - Buyer受影響的
受影響的總人數: 數字未知
工人: ( 數字未知 - 地點未知 , 農業和畜牧 , Gender not reported )議題
Occupational Health & Safety , 受傷 , 藥物可及性回應
已邀請回應:是,由The Resource Centre
載有回應的故事: (查看更多)
後續行動: None reported. The Resource Centre asked Hannaford and its parent company Ahold Delhazie to respond to the allegations. Their response can be read in full.
資訊來源: News outlet
摘要
日期: 2023年6月21日
地點: 美國
企業
Ahold Delhaize - Other Value Chain Entity , Hannaford (part of Ahold Delhaize) - Buyer受影響的
受影響的總人數: 數字未知
工人: ( 數字未知 - 地點未知 , 農業和畜牧 , Gender not reported )議題
Precarious/Unsuitable Living Conditions , Occupational Health & Safety , Denial of leave , Wage Theft回應
Response sought: 是
載有回應的故事: (查看更多)
後續行動: None reported. The Resource Centre asked Hannaford and its parent company Ahold Delhazie to respond to the allegations. Their response can be read in full.
資訊來源: News outlet
摘要
日期: 2023年6月21日
地點: 美國
企業
Ahold Delhaize - Other Value Chain Entity , Hannaford (part of Ahold Delhaize) - Buyer受影響的
受影響的總人數: 數字未知
工人: ( 數字未知 - 地點未知 , 農業和畜牧 , Gender not reported )議題
隱私 , Wage Theft , Access to Non-Judicial Remedy , Precarious/Unsuitable Living Conditions , Reasonable Working Hours & Leisure Time , 恐嚇和威脅 , Occupational Health & Safety回應
已邀請回應:是,由The Resource Centre
載有回應的故事: (查看更多)
後續行動: None reported. The Resource Centre asked Hannaford and its parent company Ahold Delhazie to respond to the allegations. Their response can be read in full.
資訊來源: News outlet
摘要
日期: 2023年6月21日
地點: 美國
企業
Ahold Delhaize - Buyer , Hannaford (part of Ahold Delhaize) - Buyer受影響的
受影響的總人數: 數字未知
移民和移民工人: ( 數字未知 - 地點未知 , 農業和畜牧 , Men , Unknown migration status )議題
Precarious/Unsuitable Living Conditions , Reasonable Working Hours & Leisure Time , Harassment (other than sexual) , 毆打和暴力 , 恐嚇和威脅 , Dismissal , Access to Non-Judicial Remedy回應
已邀請回應:是,由The Resource Centre
載有回應的故事: (查看更多)
後續行動: None reported. The Resource Centre asked Hannaford and its parent company Ahold Delhazie to respond to the allegations. Their response can be read in full.
資訊來源: News outlet
摘要
日期: 2023年6月21日
地點: 美國
企業
Ahold Delhaize - Other Value Chain Entity , Hannaford (part of Ahold Delhaize) - Buyer其他
Not Reported ( 農業和畜牧 ) - Employer受影響的
受影響的總人數: 數字未知
移民和移民工人: ( 數字未知 - 地點未知 , 農業和畜牧 , Gender not reported , Unknown migration status )議題
Precarious/Unsuitable Living Conditions , 隱私 , 恐嚇和威脅 , 剝奪言論自由 , Occupational Health & Safety , 種族/民族/階層/出身歧視回應
已邀請回應:是,由The Resource Centre
載有回應的故事: (查看更多)
後續行動: None reported. The Resource Centre asked Hannaford and its parent company Ahold Delhazie to respond to the allegations. Their response can be read in full.
資訊來源: News outlet
摘要
日期: 2023年6月21日
地點: 美國
企業
Hannaford (part of Ahold Delhaize) - Buyer , Ahold Delhaize - Other Value Chain Entity受影響的
受影響的總人數: 數字未知
移民和移民工人: ( 數字未知 - 地點未知 , 農業和畜牧 , Gender not reported , Unknown migration status )議題
Occupational Health & Safety , 種族/民族/階層/出身歧視 , Precarious/Unsuitable Living Conditions , Access to Non-Judicial Remedy , 恐嚇和威脅回應
已邀請回應:是,由The Resource Centre
載有回應的故事: (查看更多)
後續行動: None reported. The Resource Centre asked Hannaford and its parent company Ahold Delhazie to respond to the allegations. Their response can be read in full.
資訊來源: News outlet
For years, farmworkers have called on Hannaford Supermarkets to take responsibility for the rights and well-being of the workers behind Hannaford-brand milk by joining the Milk with Dignity Program. Hannaford has responded that participation in Milk with Dignity is unnecessary, because the company’s “Standards of Engagement” sufficiently protect workers’ rights. The centerpiece of that claim is Hannaford’s “Speak-Up Line:” following years of farmworkers denouncing deplorable conditions, the supermarket chain launched a hotline for workers in its supply chain.
Over the past year, farmworkers have put Hannaford’s “Speak-Up Line” to the test. Workers on ten farms submitted complaints about abuse and mistreatment. What has their experience shown? On every front, Hannaford’s system has failed to protect farmworker rights.
Farmworkers’ experiences reveal Hannaford’s “Speak-Up Line” as a poor imitation of Milk with Dignity. It lacks the accessibility that makes Milk with Dignity an effective program to protect workers’ rights. The “investigations” conducted in response to workers’ complaints are grossly inadequate and biased, in contrast to Milk with Dignity’s speedy, thorough, and professional investigations. Hannaford has not provided remediation to a single worker’s complaint, as opposed to the hundreds of complaints resulting in remediation on Milk with Dignity farms.
These failures mean that Hannaford has been unable to provide enforceable protections for farmworkers: its much-touted “Standards of Engagement” are meaningless to the workers whose rights are violated daily. Meanwhile, the protections guaranteed by Milk with Dignity are well-documented and incontrovertible.
[...]