abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfiltergenderglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptwitteruniversalityweb

這頁面沒有繁體中文版本,現以English顯示

內容有以下的語言版本: English, français

文章

2024年8月20日

作者:
Didier Makal, Mongabay

In the DRC, a government commission is taking funds owed to people relocated by mines

查看所有標籤 指控

After a devastating human toll of 11 dead and several ill due to continued air and river pollution, the village of Kabombwa has definitively disappeared from the map. More than 1,000 residents have found housing elsewhere in the Democratic Republic of Congo’s (DRC) province of Lualaba, including in the neighboring mining town of Fungurume.

Kabombwa’s tranquility had begun fading away in 2020 when lime production began at a nearby plant operated by the Chinese company Tenke Fungurume Mining SA (TFM). According to an official from Fungurume town hall, after over a year of discussions about financial compensation, the inhabitants of Kabombwa received between $3,000 and $5,000 from the government when they were relocated. But for the village’s inhabitants, the amount is far from sufficient. It isn’t enough to buy a house or build a new one in their new villages.

One reason for the insufficient compensation is the provincial government’s administrative process, civil society organizations tell Mongabay.

More precisely due to the Relocation Commission (Commission de délocalisations), a body created by the provincial government of Lualaba to oversee evictions and relocation. This commission ends up taking a percentage of the total funds owed to relocated people. Mining companies, on their end, rarely get involved in the dispute after paying the sum, leaving the government to manage compensating those affected.

Unfair compensation has become a pattern in mining relocations in Lualaba, a province with large deposits of copper and cobalt, two essential minerals for phones, computers and renewable energy technologies. The rush for these precious minerals has caused local residents to fear not only relocation itself but also relocation under unfair circumstances.

How is compensation received? First, the Relocation Commission conducts an appraisal to determine the value of relocated people’s property. The commission is made up of government officials, deputies, members of civil society, and land technicians. After the appraisal, the mining company makes its payments...

The Relocation Commission, however, receives 10% of the total cost of payments to be made to relocated people, sources explain...this percentage is to fund its operations and its members’ remuneration.

Ten percent of the total amount to be distributed is therefore missing when it reaches beneficiaries. When communities speak of unfair compensation in circumstances such as these, the private companies take no responsibility. Yet they paid 10% of the total amount due to the commission’s technicians, complain civil society organizations.

This means that those who are being relocated are the ones financing the expertise leading to their relocation, Kalenga says.

According to both the Mining Code as well as the Mining Regulations (Annex 18), the holder of the mining rights, thus the mining company, is the party responsible for relocating people exposed to the mining’s harmful effects. This would suggest that the mining company therefore assumes the total cost, including an extra 10% commission, and not the beneficiaries.

For example, in Tshabula, a village near the city of Musonoïe in Kolwezi, and Kakanda, a village near Fungurume, farmers are waiting to be resettled by the mining companies COMMUS [Joint venture between Zijin Mining and Gécamines] and Boss Mining, a subsidiary of Eurasian Natural Resources PLC. Despite the state’s investment in the process, dissatisfaction prevails. Each relocation sees the demand for more funds for property that people say is undervalued, such as houses and fruit trees.

However, according to Christophe Kabwik, an activist who has long defended the inhabitants of Kalukuluku, a village near the Ruashi Mine east of the city of Lubumbashi, mining companies don’t like to organize resettlement for people who have to leave their mining sites. Kabwik believes the reason to be that mining companies prefer to pay less by giving cash rather than building new houses. In 2006, with assistance from the city’s deputy mayor, Ruashi Mining rejected the option of resettling some 200 people who had requested relocation...

時間線

隱私資訊

本網站使用 cookie 和其他網絡存儲技術。您可以在下方設置您的隱私選項。您所作的更改將立即生效。

有關我們使用網絡儲存技術的更多資訊,請參閱我們的 數據使用和 Cookie 政策

Strictly necessary storage

ON
OFF

Necessary storage enables core site functionality. This site cannot function without it, so it can only be disabled by changing settings in your browser.

分析cookie

ON
OFF

您瀏覽本網頁時我們將以Google Analytics收集信息。接受此cookie將有助我們理解您的瀏覽資訊,並協助我們改善呈現資訊的方法。所有分析資訊都以匿名方式收集,我們並不能用相關資訊得到您的個人信息。谷歌在所有主要瀏覽器中都提供退出Google Analytics的添加應用程式。

市場營銷cookies

ON
OFF

我們從第三方網站獲得企業責任資訊,當中包括社交媒體和搜尋引擎。這些cookie協助我們理解相關瀏覽數據。

您在此網站上的隱私選項

本網站使用 cookie 和其他網絡儲存技術來增強您在必要核心功能之外的體驗。