abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfiltergenderglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptwitteruniversalityweb

這頁面沒有繁體中文版本,現以English顯示

內容有以下的語言版本: English, 日本語

故事

2020年10月7日

Indonesia: Omnibus Bill aimed at boosting investment faces criticism from CSOs & investors over threat to environment and workers’ rights

On 5 October 2020, the Indonesian House of Representatives passed the Omnibus Bill on Job Creation, which the government argues will make the country more attractive to foreign investors and aid the economy recover from the fallout of the Covid-19 pandemic.

However, unions, campaigners and investors have criticised the bill as posing a threat to hard-won labour right and environmental-protection regulations. A draft version of the bill scraps mandatory paid leave for childbirth, weddings, baptisms, bereavement, and menstruation. Overtime will be increased, and mandatory severance benefits will be decreased. Environmental protection regulation will also be reduced in scope, with only “high risk” projects required to undertake an environmental impact assessment.

On the 7th October, critics embarked up a three-day national strike. Police used water cannons and teargas to disperse protestors, arresting 23.

On 1 December 2021, it was reported that the Indonesian Constitutional Court ruled that the Omnibus Bill was unconstitutional, suspended its most harmful features, and gave the government two years to rectify the bill.

In January 2023, Indonesian unions condemned and rejected an emergency regulation issued in December 2022 by the president, in lieu of the Omnibus Law. The unions reported that the emergency regulation failed to meet union demands, and claimed that some of the provisions gave governors discretionary power to determine minimum wage.

時間線

隱私資訊

本網站使用 cookie 和其他網絡存儲技術。您可以在下方設置您的隱私選項。您所作的更改將立即生效。

有關我們使用網絡儲存技術的更多資訊,請參閱我們的 數據使用和 Cookie 政策

Strictly necessary storage

ON
OFF

Necessary storage enables core site functionality. This site cannot function without it, so it can only be disabled by changing settings in your browser.

分析cookie

ON
OFF

您瀏覽本網頁時我們將以Google Analytics收集信息。接受此cookie將有助我們理解您的瀏覽資訊,並協助我們改善呈現資訊的方法。所有分析資訊都以匿名方式收集,我們並不能用相關資訊得到您的個人信息。谷歌在所有主要瀏覽器中都提供退出Google Analytics的添加應用程式。

市場營銷cookies

ON
OFF

我們從第三方網站獲得企業責任資訊,當中包括社交媒體和搜尋引擎。這些cookie協助我們理解相關瀏覽數據。

您在此網站上的隱私選項

本網站使用 cookie 和其他網絡儲存技術來增強您在必要核心功能之外的體驗。