abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfiltergenderglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptwitteruniversalityweb

這頁面沒有繁體中文版本,現以English顯示

非政府組織回答

2023年2月28日

作者:
IndustriALL & industriAll European Trade Union

IndustriALL rejoinder to POSCO Assan’s reply to BHRRC dated July 2022

IndustriALL Global Union and industriAll European Trade Union, both representing workers in mining, energy, and manufacturing industries throughout the world, wish to contest POSCO Assan’s reply to BHRRC dated July 2022, which does not reflect reality and misleads the public and investors regarding human rights violations at its Kocaeli plant...

In their most recent reply to BHRRC in June 2022, POSCO Assan says that: “As a result of the lawsuits filed by the workers who were dismissed due to indiscipline, a decision was made to reemploy the workers and to pay compensation to the workers if they were not hired. As there is an elective right of employer according to law; Posco Assan TST chose to pay all of the compensations included in the court decision when the court decisions

became final.”

This is not true, as it can easily be shown by the court decisions, initially at the court of first instance, which were challenged and upheld by the Regional Court of Appeals and later by the highest court, the Supreme Court...

In these decisions, the court clearly states that POSCO dismissed the workers due to their union activity and obliges POSCO to pay 12 months extra salary in addition to their severance pay, which is not mentioned in POSCO’s reply regarding these dismissal cases. The judges’ wording is very clear on this: they outline that article 25 of the Law on Trade Unions and Collective Bargaining No. 6356 regarding freedom of association has been violated and as a penalty for this violation of union rights, the company must pay an additional 12 months’ salary without any conditions.

Along with serious violations of individual workers’ rights, the company management also violates the collective rights of workers, particularly freedom of association and the right to collective bargaining, by denying that Birleşik Metal İş is legally the representative union, despite clear rulings by the court.

The local court ruled in favour of Birleşik Metal-İş, and the Court of Appeal confirmed the ruling. As a final step, the company took the matter to the Court of Cassation. The final court, the Court of Cassation, decided that Birleşik Metal İş is the representative union in the workplace...

[full response attached]

時間線

隱私資訊

本網站使用 cookie 和其他網絡存儲技術。您可以在下方設置您的隱私選項。您所作的更改將立即生效。

有關我們使用網絡儲存技術的更多資訊,請參閱我們的 數據使用和 Cookie 政策

Strictly necessary storage

ON
OFF

Necessary storage enables core site functionality. This site cannot function without it, so it can only be disabled by changing settings in your browser.

分析cookie

ON
OFF

您瀏覽本網頁時我們將以Google Analytics收集信息。接受此cookie將有助我們理解您的瀏覽資訊,並協助我們改善呈現資訊的方法。所有分析資訊都以匿名方式收集,我們並不能用相關資訊得到您的個人信息。谷歌在所有主要瀏覽器中都提供退出Google Analytics的添加應用程式。

市場營銷cookies

ON
OFF

我們從第三方網站獲得企業責任資訊,當中包括社交媒體和搜尋引擎。這些cookie協助我們理解相關瀏覽數據。

您在此網站上的隱私選項

本網站使用 cookie 和其他網絡儲存技術來增強您在必要核心功能之外的體驗。