abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfiltergenderglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptwitteruniversalityweb

這頁面沒有繁體中文版本,現以English顯示

文章

2017年2月13日

作者:
Claes Cronstedt, Jan Eijsbouts & Robert C. Thompson, on Lawyers for Better Business

International business and human rights arbitration

...Victims of business-related human rights abuses have little or no access to justice...For a variety of reasons, courts at all levels have largely been unable to meet their needs...We propose that new arbitration rules (BHR Arbitration Rules) be drafted that would enable parties to human rights disputes involving business to resolve those disputes using specialized business and human rights arbitration panels (BHR Arbitration Panels), no matter where in the world the disputes have arisen.  The BHR Arbitration Rules would be a revision of international arbitration rules currently in use and aimed at meeting the special needs of business and human rights arbitration...They key interests of all stakeholders in business-related human rights disputes would be served by BHR Arbitration Panels.  MNEs and their business partners would have an effective tool to control abuse with which they would otherwise be associated and to resolve disputes in which they and/or parties in their supply chains are involved.  Victims would benefit from the greater access to remedy...States would also see greater access to justice and a consequent diminution in abuse...BHR Arbitration Panels could contribute to the implementation of all three pillars of the UNGPs − the state duty to protect human rights (Pillar One), the corporate responsibility to respect human rights (Pillar Two) and access to remedy (Pillar Three)...

For more information, please consult the project website.

屬於以下案件的一部分

Lawyers propose intl. arbitration rules as remedy for business & human rights abuses

Proposals for Intl. Tribunal on corporate liability for human rights abuses

隱私資訊

本網站使用 cookie 和其他網絡存儲技術。您可以在下方設置您的隱私選項。您所作的更改將立即生效。

有關我們使用網絡儲存技術的更多資訊,請參閱我們的 數據使用和 Cookie 政策

Strictly necessary storage

ON
OFF

Necessary storage enables core site functionality. This site cannot function without it, so it can only be disabled by changing settings in your browser.

分析cookie

ON
OFF

您瀏覽本網頁時我們將以Google Analytics收集信息。接受此cookie將有助我們理解您的瀏覽資訊,並協助我們改善呈現資訊的方法。所有分析資訊都以匿名方式收集,我們並不能用相關資訊得到您的個人信息。谷歌在所有主要瀏覽器中都提供退出Google Analytics的添加應用程式。

市場營銷cookies

ON
OFF

我們從第三方網站獲得企業責任資訊,當中包括社交媒體和搜尋引擎。這些cookie協助我們理解相關瀏覽數據。

您在此網站上的隱私選項

本網站使用 cookie 和其他網絡儲存技術來增強您在必要核心功能之外的體驗。