abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfiltergenderglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptwitteruniversalityweb

這頁面沒有繁體中文版本,現以English顯示

法律訴訟

2012年5月10日

作者:
Business & Human Rights Resource Centre

Kenya Pipeline Company lawsuit (re explosion & fire in Nairobi)

狀態: ONGOING

提訴日期
2012年5月10日
未知
社區
申訴地點: 肯亞
事發地點: 肯亞
訴訟類型: Domestic

企業

Kenya Pipeline Company 肯亞 油、氣、煤

Sources

Snapshot: In 2012, more than 300 victims of an oil spill in the slum of Mukuru-Sinai, Nairobi, filed a lawsuit against Kenya Pipeline Company, among others. They allege the defendants acted negligently in constructing the oil pipeline in the middle of the slum and failed to uphold their duty of care. Defendants allege they do not bear direct responsibility for the damage. Proceedings are ongoing. 

On 12 September 2011, a spillage occurred from a pipeline owned by Kenya Pipeline Company, running through the slum of Mukuru-Sinai, in an industrial area of Nairobi.  As slum dwellers went to collect the fuel that was spilling, the pipeline exploded.  A fire broke out in the Sinai area. The explosion and the fire together killed about 120 people and injured hundreds.

In May 2012, more than 300 victims brought a lawsuit against, among others, Kenya Pipeline Company, Kenya Power and Lighting Company, the City Council of Nairobi, and the National Environment Management Authority.  They claim that the defendants acted negligently in constructing an oil pipeline in the middle of the slum, without putting adequate fire equipment in place, and failed to uphold their statutory duties.  The plaintiffs are seeking over KSh25 billion (worth about US$300 million at the time) in compensation.  The defendants argue that they do not bear direct responsibility for the fire and that the victims have failed to show the defendants have breached their duties under the law.  They asked to be removed from the lawsuit and made an application to the High Court in this regard in November 2012.  In February 2014, hearings commenced in the High Court and the first witnesses testified.  

High Court Judge David Majanja, who presided over the case from the start, approved out-of-court discussions involving the Government, Nairobi Senator Mike Sonko, Kenya Pipeline, the National Environmental Management Authority, and the victims. Yet, Judge Lenoala, who subsequently presided the case, learned that with Kenya Pipeline having withdrawn from the negotiations, the Government expressed concerns that an agreement on payments might not be reached.

The High Court has rejected to award 25 billion shillings sought by the plaintiffs. Instead, the court instructed them to file a proper suit for damages specifically addressing personal injury claims. Furthermore, the court ruled that claimants are obligated to file a negligence suit for the recovery of damages. In this process, each claimant must demonstrate their individual losses and establish liability based on breach of duty, causation, and damages. Nairobi Senator, Gideon Mbuvi intends to appeal the High Court decision.

-"Sonko To Appeal Case Where Court Declined To Compensate Sinai Fire Survivors", Dzuya Walter, Citizen Digital, 8 Feb 2017

-"Sinai Fire Victims Denied SH25 Billion by Court", Sam Alfan, Nairobi Times, 6 Feb 2017

-"Blow To Sinai Fire Victims As Court Declines To Award Them Compensation", Dzuya Walter, Citizen Digital, 6 Feb 2017

-"Kenya Pipeline Corporation pulls out of talks with fire victims", Kurian Musa, the Standard, 2014

- “Nairobi Senator Sonko finally testifies in Sinai fire tragedy case”, Kurian Musa, Standard Media (Kenya), 14 Feb 2014
- “State negligence caused Sinai tragedy, court told”, Vincent Agoya, Daily Nation (Kenya), 13 Feb 2014
- “Sinai slum fire victims anxious over delay in compensation hearing”, Vincent Agoya, Daily Nation (Kenya), 23 Oct 2013
- “City council wants out of Sinai suit”, Alphonce Mungahu, Star (Kenya), 6 Nov 2012
-  “Three seek to be excluded from Sh25bn Sinai fire case”, Daily Nation (Kenya), 5 Nov 2012
- “Sonko has 300 Sinai fire witnesses in Sh25 billion suit”, Alphonce Mungahu, Star (Kenya), 3 Nov 2012
- “Victims of Sinai fire seek compensation”, Isaiah Lucheli, Standard Digital (Kenya), 10 May 2012
- “What government and KPC should do to avert future tragedies in the wake of Mukuru-Sinai slum disaster”, Wambui Kimathi & Louiza Kabiru, Kenya National Commission on Human Rights, in Business Daily (Kenya),16 Sept 2011
- Kenya Pipeline Company: Press statement, 12 Sep 2011

時間線

隱私資訊

本網站使用 cookie 和其他網絡存儲技術。您可以在下方設置您的隱私選項。您所作的更改將立即生效。

有關我們使用網絡儲存技術的更多資訊,請參閱我們的 數據使用和 Cookie 政策

Strictly necessary storage

ON
OFF

Necessary storage enables core site functionality. This site cannot function without it, so it can only be disabled by changing settings in your browser.

分析cookie

ON
OFF

您瀏覽本網頁時我們將以Google Analytics收集信息。接受此cookie將有助我們理解您的瀏覽資訊,並協助我們改善呈現資訊的方法。所有分析資訊都以匿名方式收集,我們並不能用相關資訊得到您的個人信息。谷歌在所有主要瀏覽器中都提供退出Google Analytics的添加應用程式。

市場營銷cookies

ON
OFF

我們從第三方網站獲得企業責任資訊,當中包括社交媒體和搜尋引擎。這些cookie協助我們理解相關瀏覽數據。

您在此網站上的隱私選項

本網站使用 cookie 和其他網絡儲存技術來增強您在必要核心功能之外的體驗。