企業回應
這是對（XX）的回應
屬於以下案件的一部分
Brazil: Civil society accuses FIFA of human rights abuses in Brazil related to the preparation for the 2014 FIFA World Cup
-
Observatório das Metrópoles apresenta documento analisando impactos econômicos & investimentos públicos e privados relacionados aos megaeventos
適用語言: Português -
Response by FIFA
適用語言: English -
Brasil: Especialistas concluem que legado de megaeventos é de pouca transparência, participação e projetos voltados para o mercado e não para interesse social
適用語言: Português -
[PDF] The IOC and FIFA have the power and the leverage to make the Olympic Games and the World Cup more ‘socially responsible’
適用語言: English -
Brazil: Dossier on megaevents & human rights violations in Rio is launched by civil society and university
適用語言: English
瀏覽完整時間線
Public Eye Awards 2014
-
Response by FIFA
適用語言: English -
Response by Bayer: 10 companies with "worst corporate social responsibility records" nominated for 2014 Public Eye Awards.
適用語言: English -
Response by Marine Harvest: 10 companies with "worst corporate social responsibility records" nominated for 2014 Public Eye Awards.
適用語言: English -
Response by Sime Darby: 10 companies with "worst corporate social responsibility records" nominated for 2014 Public Eye Awards.
適用語言: English -
Response by BASF: 10 companies with "worst corporate social responsibility records" nominated for 2014 Public Eye Awards.
適用語言: English -
Wilmar International did not respond to: 10 companies with "worst corporate social responsibility records" nominated for 2014 Public Eye Awards.
適用語言: English -
10 companies with "worst corporate social responsibility records" nominated for 2014 Public Eye Awards
適用語言: English -
Response by Syngenta: 10 companies with "worst corporate social responsibility records" nominated for 2014 Public Eye Awards.
適用語言: English -
Response by HSBC: 10 companies with "worst corporate social responsibility records" nominated for 2014 Public Eye Awards.
適用語言: English -
Response by FIFA: 10 companies with "worst corporate social responsibility records" nominated for 2014 Public Eye Awards
適用語言: English -
Eskom did not respond to: 10 companies with "worst corporate social responsibility records" nominated for 2014 Public Eye Awards.
適用語言: English -
Response by Gap: 10 companies with "worst corporate social responsibility records" nominated for 2014 Public Eye Awards.
適用語言: English -
Gazprom did not respond to: 10 companies with "worst corporate social responsibility records" nominated for 2014 Public Eye Awards.
適用語言: English -
Public Eye Awards 2013
適用語言: English -
Response by Glencore (now Glencore Xstrata): 10 companies with "worst corporate social responsibility records" nominated for 2014 Public Eye Awards.
適用語言: English
瀏覽完整時間線