abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfiltergenderglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptwitteruniversalityweb

Diese Seite ist nicht auf Deutsch verfügbar und wird angezeigt auf English

Artikel

23 Mai 2007

Autor:
ArmorGroup

[PDF] ArmorGroup International plc - Response to misleading War on Want report

ArmorGroup International plc has strong reservations about the War on Want report titled “Corporate Mercenaries”, which it believes is derogatory, factually misleading and potentially damaging to the company…[T]he…report…[has] misleading or factually incorrect statements…about ArmorGroup…ArmorGroup adheres to a number of international codes of conduct covering the behaviour of the Group and its employees globally…

Part of the following timelines

War on Want criticises UK Govt. for increasing use of private security companies without introducing law to curb their human rights abuses

UK: War on Want challenges govt. over failure to regulate private security companies – refers to Erinys, Aegis, ArmorGroup