abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfiltergenderglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptwitteruniversalityweb
Article

18 Mar 2011

Author:
Stephen Kurczy, Christian Science Monitor [USA]

GE defends reactors in Japan nuclear crisis

See all tags
As General Electric defends the reactors it designed for Japan's Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant, independent nuclear specialists are also coming to the company's defense...Five of the six reactors at Fukushima I are GE's so-called Mark 1...models, developed in the 1960s and installed in Japan in the 1970s. "I think GE is a hero in this," says Najmedin Meshkati of the University of Southern California..., a nuclear safety expert who has studied power plants worldwide, including at Chernobyl...The Japan nuclear crisis has brought scrutiny on GE for its Mark I design, which was criticized in the 1970s as susceptible to explosion and rupture. Three GE employees quit in 1975 in protest over safety concerns around the Mark 1 and US regulators even considered discontinuing the system..."We’d like to set the record straight," GE said in a statement Friday. "The Mark I meets all regulatory requirements and has performed well for over 40 years."...GE's statement is unlikely to quell critics of the Mark I design. [also refers to TEPCO]