abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfiltergenderglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptwitteruniversalityweb
Article

6 Aug 2006

Author:
Adam Lerrick, professor of economics at Carnegie Mellon University, scholar at American Enterprise Institute, a founder of the Wyoming chapter of the Nature Conservancy, in Financial Times

Good intentions at the expense of the poor

Vigilante non-governmental organisations (NGOs) have become the de facto regulators of the flow of finance to the developing world. They seek to seize, without compensation, the property rights of emerging nations together with their prospects for growth. Contrary to the classic interventions of the well intentioned, it is the poor world that will bear the costs while the rich world benefits. Will their rough and ready tactics win out? Do not bank on it. Quiescent resources beyond the reach of western activists will mobilise to fund a new marketplace where economic forces, not intimidation, prevail...