abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfiltergenderglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptwitteruniversalityweb
NGO Rejoinder

11 May 2015

Author:
IndustriALL

IndustriALL rejoinder

See all tags

It is disappointing but not surprising that Rio Tinto has refused to address evidence in Rio Tinto: The way it really works of discrepancies between Rio Tinto’s claims to social responsibility and its actual practices. The discrepancies are too broad‐based and systematic for the company to ignore or explain away. If Rio Tinto truly believes that the report is “based on inaccurate or out of date information,” as they claim in their response, why don’t they say what is inaccurate or out of date?