abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfiltergenderglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptwitteruniversalityweb
Article

3 May 2015

Author:
Jordan Times

Qatari Labour Minister: Qatar hopes to end sponsorship system in 2015

"Qatar hopes to end ‘kafala’ system in 2015", 04 May 2015

Qatar's labour minister said Monday he hopes the country's controversial "kafala" system, which critics have likened to modern-day slavery, will be abolished before the end of this year.

Dr Abdullah bin Saleh Al Khulaifi, the minister of labour and social affairs, said he was "90 per cent" certain the system would be replaced within the next seven months...

Under kafala, employers can prevent foreign workers from changing jobs or leaving the country...

Doha says it will replace the system with one based instead on employment contracts.

These contracts would last a maximum of five years and the current exit permit system would be replaced with one where workers give the authorities a maximum of 72 hours' notice that they want to leave the country.

Khulaifi also said Qatar would fully implement another major labour reform — an electronic payment system for thousands of migrant labourers — by mid-August...

Mustafa Qadri, Amnesty's Gulf migrant rights researcher, welcomed any change but said more was needed.

"It's another form of kafala with a different name, admittedly less restrictive but with many of the same problems."

He added that contract arrangements and the ability to leave the country for workers under the proposed changes would "still be a situation of forced labour because the employer still has the power over the employee"...