abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfiltergenderglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptwitteruniversalityweb

이 페이지는 한국어로 제공되지 않으며 English로 표시됩니다.

기사

2008년 8월 31일

저자:
Nick Mathiason, Observer [UK]

Shell comes under fire for role in Sakhalin audit

Royal Dutch Shell faces damaging claims over its influence on a supposedly independent environmental audit to determine whether the...[Sakhalin II] oil and gas project would receive vital bank funding... Dozens of emails released by the government...reveal anxiety from an unidentified party, thought to be a UK government agency, at how Shell was 'stage managing' the review conducted by AEA Technology... The report…was used by banks to assess whether funding Sakhalin II was consistent with environmental and social protocols...A spokesman for Shell said: "The opportunity for Sakhalin Energy [joint venture Shell, Gazprom, Mitsui, Mitsubishi] and its shareholders to provide comments on a draft report of this kind is routine and designed to ensure accuracy. The findings contained in AEA Technology's report are entirely theirs."