abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfiltergenderglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptwitteruniversalityweb

Эта страница недоступна на Русский и отображается на English

Статья

25 Янв 2005

Автор:
John O’Reilly, member of Amnesty International UK business group, former BP executive

[DOC] Response by John O’Reilly to the Economist survey on Corporate Social Responsibility

Doesn’t the litany of unhappy experiences of Shell in Nigeria, BP in Colombia, Unocal in Burma, Freeport in West Papua etc., merit addressing in any discussion about companies’ wider social responsibilities, particularly in countries characterised by conflict or political oppression?