abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfiltergenderglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptwitteruniversalityweb

Esta página no está disponible en Español y está siendo mostrada en English

Artículo

20 Mar 2015

Autor:
Brook Baker, Professor of Law at Northeastern University, UNITAID civil society board member and Board member of Health Global Access Project

Comment by Brook Baker

The human rights and patient consequences of Gilead's proposed anti-diversion policies in its tiered-pricing and licensing programs for sofosbuvir, listed by MSF, are quite specific and substance-focused... Gilead's response on the other hand is vague and process oriented - it promises consultation with no specifics in terms of the concerns raised.

Línea del tiempo