abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfiltergenderglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptwitteruniversalityweb

這頁面沒有繁體中文版本,現以English顯示

文章

2015年3月20日

作者:
Brook Baker, Professor of Law at Northeastern University, UNITAID civil society board member and Board member of Health Global Access Project

Comment by Brook Baker

查看所有標籤

The human rights and patient consequences of Gilead's proposed anti-diversion policies in its tiered-pricing and licensing programs for sofosbuvir, listed by MSF, are quite specific and substance-focused... Gilead's response on the other hand is vague and process oriented - it promises consultation with no specifics in terms of the concerns raised.

時間線