abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfiltergenderglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptwitteruniversalityweb

このページは 日本語 では利用できません。English で表示されています

ストーリー

2016年10月11日

Fossil fuel firms respond to petition before Philippines Human Rights Commission on human rights & climate impacts

Greenpeace, disaster survivors, and community organisations from the Philippines submitted a complaint to the Commission on Human Rights of the Philippines (CHR) against 47 large fossil fuel and cement companies over their role in "human-induced climate change" that "interferes with the enjoyment of Filipinos' fundamental rights." In July 2016, CHR sent the complaint to the oil, coal, mining and cement companies, and asked them to respond to the allegations. 

Business & Human Rights Resource Centre invited the following companies to publicly share their responses:

  • Alpha Natural Resources
  • Anadarko
  • Anglo American
  • Apache
  • Arch Coal
  • BHP Billiton
  • BP
  • Canadian Natural Resources
  • Cemex
  • Chevron
  • Conoco Philipps
  • Consol
  • Devon
  • EnCana
  • Eni
  • ExxonMobil
  • Freeport-McMoRan
  • Glencore
  • HeidelbergCement
  • Hess
  • Holcim
  • Husky Energy
  • Italcementi 
  • Kiewit*
  • Lafarge
  • Lukoil
  • Luminant
  • Marathon
  • Murphy Oil
  • Murray Coal
  • North American Coal
  • Occidental
  • OMV
  • Peabody Energy
  • RAG
  • Repsol
  • Rio Tinto
  • Rosneft
  • RWE
  • Sasol
  • Shell
  • Suncor
  • Total
  • UK Coal*
  • Westmoreland

The following companies responded:

  • Anglo American
  • BHP Billiton
  • BP
  • ConocoPhillips
  • Eni
  • Freeport-McMoRan
  • Glencore
  • Lukoil
  • Peabody Energy
  • Repsol
  • Rio Tinto

The following companies declined to respond:

  • Husky Energy

We welcome and encourage companies to publish their responses on this page at any point. Please send your statements to dobson[at]business-humanrights.org

*we have been unable to contact

企業への回答リクエスト

Anglo American 回答を見る
Glencore 回答を見る
Freeport-McMoRan 回答を見る
Rio Tinto 回答を見る
ConocoPhillips 回答を見る
Peabody Energy 回答を見る

タイムライン

プライバシー情報

このサイトでは、クッキーやその他のウェブストレージ技術を使用しています。お客様は、以下の方法でプライバシーに関する選択肢を設定することができます。変更は直ちに反映されます。

ウェブストレージの使用についての詳細は、当社の データ使用およびクッキーに関するポリシーをご覧ください

Strictly necessary storage

ON
OFF

Necessary storage enables core site functionality. This site cannot function without it, so it can only be disabled by changing settings in your browser.

クッキーのアナリティクス

ON
OFF

When you access our website we use Google Analytics to collect information on your visit. Accepting this cookie will allow us to understand more details about your journey, and improve how we surface information. All analytics information is anonymous and we do not use it to identify you. Google provides a Google Analytics opt-out add on for all popular browsers.

Promotional cookies

ON
OFF

We share news and updates on business and human rights through third party platforms, including social media and search engines. These cookies help us to understand the performance of these promotions.

本サイトにおけるお客様のプライバシーに関する選択

このサイトでは、必要なコア機能を超えてお客様の利便性を高めるために、クッキーやその他のウェブストレージ技術を使用しています。