abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfiltergenderglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptwitteruniversalityweb

このページは 日本語 では利用できません。English で表示されています

記事

2023年10月20日

著者:
Tim Healy, Irish Independent

Ireland: Delivery drivers for a pizza restaurant should be treated as employees, not contractors, rules Supreme Court

"Delivery drivers for pizza restaurant should be treated as employees, not contractors, Supreme Court finds", 20 Oct 2023

The Supreme Court has found that delivery drivers for a pizza restaurant should be treated as employees and not contractors.

The decision has important implications for workers in the gig economy.

The case concerned delivery drivers engaged under contracts in 2010/11 by Karshan (Midlands) Ltd, trading as Domino's Pizza.

The drivers argued they were employees for tax purposes and Karshan said they were independent contractors under "contracts for service".

Karshan had appealed a 2018 decision of a Tax Appeals Commissioner that the delivery drivers should be treated as PAYE workers.

The High Court rejected that appeal, but the Court of Appeal (CoA), in a 2-1 majority, overturned that decision...

In a unanimous decision today on Friday, a seven-judge Supreme Court overturned the CoA decision.

Giving the court's decision, Mr Justice Brian Murray said central to the appeal was whether it was necessary, to the establishment of the employment relationship, that there be a requirement that the employer and worker owe each other certain "mutual obligations"...

Mr Justice Murray said there was no such requirement in Irish law.

He said the question of whether a contract is one "of" or "for" services should – having regard to well-established case law – be resolved by reference to five questions...

The evidence disclosed "close control" by Karshan over the drivers when they work...

In observations accompanying the judgment, Mr Justice Murray said it must be stated that the finding that the drivers were employees did not, and cannot, bind any driver who may wish to contend that, in fact, they were not an employee for this or any other purpose. The question of whether drivers have continuous service for the purpose of other legislation, and in particular employment rights legislation, cannot be decided here, he said...

プライバシー情報

このサイトでは、クッキーやその他のウェブストレージ技術を使用しています。お客様は、以下の方法でプライバシーに関する選択肢を設定することができます。変更は直ちに反映されます。

ウェブストレージの使用についての詳細は、当社の データ使用およびクッキーに関するポリシーをご覧ください

Strictly necessary storage

ON
OFF

Necessary storage enables core site functionality. This site cannot function without it, so it can only be disabled by changing settings in your browser.

クッキーのアナリティクス

ON
OFF

When you access our website we use Google Analytics to collect information on your visit. Accepting this cookie will allow us to understand more details about your journey, and improve how we surface information. All analytics information is anonymous and we do not use it to identify you. Google provides a Google Analytics opt-out add on for all popular browsers.

Promotional cookies

ON
OFF

We share news and updates on business and human rights through third party platforms, including social media and search engines. These cookies help us to understand the performance of these promotions.

本サイトにおけるお客様のプライバシーに関する選択

このサイトでは、必要なコア機能を超えてお客様の利便性を高めるために、クッキーやその他のウェブストレージ技術を使用しています。