abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfiltergenderglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptwitteruniversalityweb

このページは 日本語 では利用できません。English で表示されています

訴訟

2012年5月10日

著者:
Business & Human Rights Resource Centre

Kenya Pipeline Company lawsuit (re explosion & fire in Nairobi)

ステータス: ONGOING

Date lawsuit was filed
2012年5月10日
不明
コミュニティ
申立の提出場所: ケニア
事件の発生場所: ケニア
訴訟の種類: 国内

企業

Kenya Pipeline Company ケニア 石油・ガス・石炭

ソース

Snapshot: In 2012, more than 300 victims of an oil spill in the slum of Mukuru-Sinai, Nairobi, filed a lawsuit against Kenya Pipeline Company, among others. They allege the defendants acted negligently in constructing the oil pipeline in the middle of the slum and failed to uphold their duty of care. Defendants allege they do not bear direct responsibility for the damage. Proceedings are ongoing. 

On 12 September 2011, a spillage occurred from a pipeline owned by Kenya Pipeline Company, running through the slum of Mukuru-Sinai, in an industrial area of Nairobi.  As slum dwellers went to collect the fuel that was spilling, the pipeline exploded.  A fire broke out in the Sinai area. The explosion and the fire together killed about 120 people and injured hundreds.

In May 2012, more than 300 victims brought a lawsuit against, among others, Kenya Pipeline Company, Kenya Power and Lighting Company, the City Council of Nairobi, and the National Environment Management Authority.  They claim that the defendants acted negligently in constructing an oil pipeline in the middle of the slum, without putting adequate fire equipment in place, and failed to uphold their statutory duties.  The plaintiffs are seeking over KSh25 billion (worth about US$300 million at the time) in compensation.  The defendants argue that they do not bear direct responsibility for the fire and that the victims have failed to show the defendants have breached their duties under the law.  They asked to be removed from the lawsuit and made an application to the High Court in this regard in November 2012.  In February 2014, hearings commenced in the High Court and the first witnesses testified.  

High Court Judge David Majanja, who presided over the case from the start, approved out-of-court discussions involving the Government, Nairobi Senator Mike Sonko, Kenya Pipeline, the National Environmental Management Authority, and the victims. Yet, Judge Lenoala, who subsequently presided the case, learned that with Kenya Pipeline having withdrawn from the negotiations, the Government expressed concerns that an agreement on payments might not be reached.

The High Court has rejected to award 25 billion shillings sought by the plaintiffs. Instead, the court instructed them to file a proper suit for damages specifically addressing personal injury claims. Furthermore, the court ruled that claimants are obligated to file a negligence suit for the recovery of damages. In this process, each claimant must demonstrate their individual losses and establish liability based on breach of duty, causation, and damages. Nairobi Senator, Gideon Mbuvi intends to appeal the High Court decision.

-"Sonko To Appeal Case Where Court Declined To Compensate Sinai Fire Survivors", Dzuya Walter, Citizen Digital, 8 Feb 2017

-"Sinai Fire Victims Denied SH25 Billion by Court", Sam Alfan, Nairobi Times, 6 Feb 2017

-"Blow To Sinai Fire Victims As Court Declines To Award Them Compensation", Dzuya Walter, Citizen Digital, 6 Feb 2017

-"Kenya Pipeline Corporation pulls out of talks with fire victims", Kurian Musa, the Standard, 2014

- “Nairobi Senator Sonko finally testifies in Sinai fire tragedy case”, Kurian Musa, Standard Media (Kenya), 14 Feb 2014
- “State negligence caused Sinai tragedy, court told”, Vincent Agoya, Daily Nation (Kenya), 13 Feb 2014
- “Sinai slum fire victims anxious over delay in compensation hearing”, Vincent Agoya, Daily Nation (Kenya), 23 Oct 2013
- “City council wants out of Sinai suit”, Alphonce Mungahu, Star (Kenya), 6 Nov 2012
-  “Three seek to be excluded from Sh25bn Sinai fire case”, Daily Nation (Kenya), 5 Nov 2012
- “Sonko has 300 Sinai fire witnesses in Sh25 billion suit”, Alphonce Mungahu, Star (Kenya), 3 Nov 2012
- “Victims of Sinai fire seek compensation”, Isaiah Lucheli, Standard Digital (Kenya), 10 May 2012
- “What government and KPC should do to avert future tragedies in the wake of Mukuru-Sinai slum disaster”, Wambui Kimathi & Louiza Kabiru, Kenya National Commission on Human Rights, in Business Daily (Kenya),16 Sept 2011
- Kenya Pipeline Company: Press statement, 12 Sep 2011

タイムライン

プライバシー情報

このサイトでは、クッキーやその他のウェブストレージ技術を使用しています。お客様は、以下の方法でプライバシーに関する選択肢を設定することができます。変更は直ちに反映されます。

ウェブストレージの使用についての詳細は、当社の データ使用およびクッキーに関するポリシーをご覧ください

Strictly necessary storage

ON
OFF

Necessary storage enables core site functionality. This site cannot function without it, so it can only be disabled by changing settings in your browser.

クッキーのアナリティクス

ON
OFF

When you access our website we use Google Analytics to collect information on your visit. Accepting this cookie will allow us to understand more details about your journey, and improve how we surface information. All analytics information is anonymous and we do not use it to identify you. Google provides a Google Analytics opt-out add on for all popular browsers.

Promotional cookies

ON
OFF

We share news and updates on business and human rights through third party platforms, including social media and search engines. These cookies help us to understand the performance of these promotions.

本サイトにおけるお客様のプライバシーに関する選択

このサイトでは、必要なコア機能を超えてお客様の利便性を高めるために、クッキーやその他のウェブストレージ技術を使用しています。