abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfiltergenderglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptwitteruniversalityweb

このページは 日本語 では利用できません。English で表示されています

ストーリー

8 6月 2023

Netherlands: Environmental groups bring landmark greenwashing lawsuit against KLM over carbon-offsetting scheme advert

In July 2022, environmentalist groups, including Fossielvrij, ClientEarth and Reclame Fossielvrij, launched a lawsuit against KLM. The groups argue the company ran misleading adverts for its 2019 sustainability scheme called 'Fly Responsibly'. The programme, which KLM has since stopped, allowed consumers to 'offset' carbon emissions from their flights by funding reforestation projects or KLM biofuel purchases. The groups argue such marketing was environmentally misleading and breached EU consumer law. The groups are also challenging KLM's claim that the company is "creating a more sustainable future", as its goal to reach net zero emissions by 2050 contradicts KLM's plans for future growth.

In June 2023, the District Court of Amsterdam allowed Fossielvrij and Reclame Fossielvrij to bring the claim against KLM in court. The ruling marks the first instance a court allowed an environmental non-profit to bring a greenwashing case under a new Dutch class action law. The groups also assert the greenwashing lawsuit is the first to be brought against the airline industry.

In March 2024, KLM was found guilty of misleading customers with vague environmental claims. The court determined that KLM had violated the law with misleading advertising in 15 of 19 environmental statements, criticizing the airline for presenting an overly optimistic view of its sustainable aviation fuel initiatives and tree-planting efforts. KLM responded by stating that the communications addressed in the case had not been used for some time and expressed satisfaction that the court allowed them to continue communicating transparently about their sustainability efforts.

タイムライン

プライバシー情報

このサイトでは、クッキーやその他のウェブストレージ技術を使用しています。お客様は、以下の方法でプライバシーに関する選択肢を設定することができます。変更は直ちに反映されます。

ウェブストレージの使用についての詳細は、当社の データ使用およびクッキーに関するポリシーをご覧ください

Strictly necessary storage

ON
OFF

Necessary storage enables core site functionality. This site cannot function without it, so it can only be disabled by changing settings in your browser.

クッキーのアナリティクス

ON
OFF

When you access our website we use Google Analytics to collect information on your visit. Accepting this cookie will allow us to understand more details about your journey, and improve how we surface information. All analytics information is anonymous and we do not use it to identify you. Google provides a Google Analytics opt-out add on for all popular browsers.

Promotional cookies

ON
OFF

We share news and updates on business and human rights through third party platforms, including social media and search engines. These cookies help us to understand the performance of these promotions.

本サイトにおけるお客様のプライバシーに関する選択

このサイトでは、必要なコア機能を超えてお客様の利便性を高めるために、クッキーやその他のウェブストレージ技術を使用しています。