abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfiltergenderglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptwitteruniversalityweb

このページは 日本語 では利用できません。English で表示されています

記事

2022年12月13日

著者:
Karolin Seitz, Global Policy Forum

"No more sideshow" - Global Policy Forum's Report on the 8th session of the Intergovt. Working Group on a proposed treaty

"No more sideshow - Report on the eighth session of the UN open-ended intergovernmental working group on a legally binding instrument on transnational corporations and other business enterprises with respect to human rights ", Dec 2022

Since 2014, the United Nations (UN) Human Rights Council in Geneva has been negotiating an internationally binding agreement on business and human rights – also known as the UN Treaty. From October 24–28, 2022, the intergovernmental working group on a legally binding instrument on transnational corporations and other business enterprises with respect to human rights (OEIGWG) met for the eighth time. The countries of the global South as well as the major industrialized nations were present at the meeting. New informal proposals by the Ecuadorian Chair caused initial confusion in the negotiations. With the G7’s commitment in June 2022 to an international binding standard, the formation of the ”Friends of the Chair“ group, the U.S. government now co-negotiating, and the prospect of a European Union negotiating mandate, the process has gained new weight and momentum …

The U.S. participated in the negotiations for the second time…The U.S. believes that a less prescriptive approach, in the form of a framework agreement, would be a better option…

The business sector was again represented...calling for business representatives to be at the table in the drafting of the agreement, even though the process is intergovernmental…

Once again, numerous civil society organizations from around the world participated with comments and proposed amendments to the draft text…The demand for direct corporate obligations in the agreement and an international human rights tribunal before which people affected can sue transnational corporations for human rights violations was raised…

In order to achieve real progress in the negotiations, a time and work schedule with an increased frequency of thematically focused meetings between the annual sessions would be necessary. The countries should also set themselves a common goal with regard to the time horizon…

タイムライン

プライバシー情報

このサイトでは、クッキーやその他のウェブストレージ技術を使用しています。お客様は、以下の方法でプライバシーに関する選択肢を設定することができます。変更は直ちに反映されます。

ウェブストレージの使用についての詳細は、当社の データ使用およびクッキーに関するポリシーをご覧ください

Strictly necessary storage

ON
OFF

Necessary storage enables core site functionality. This site cannot function without it, so it can only be disabled by changing settings in your browser.

クッキーのアナリティクス

ON
OFF

When you access our website we use Google Analytics to collect information on your visit. Accepting this cookie will allow us to understand more details about your journey, and improve how we surface information. All analytics information is anonymous and we do not use it to identify you. Google provides a Google Analytics opt-out add on for all popular browsers.

Promotional cookies

ON
OFF

We share news and updates on business and human rights through third party platforms, including social media and search engines. These cookies help us to understand the performance of these promotions.

本サイトにおけるお客様のプライバシーに関する選択

このサイトでは、必要なコア機能を超えてお客様の利便性を高めるために、クッキーやその他のウェブストレージ技術を使用しています。