abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeblueskyburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfilterflaggenderglobeglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptwitteruniversalitywebwhatsappxIcons / Social / YouTube

このページは 日本語 では利用できません。English で表示されています

ストーリー

Switzerland: OECD National Contact Point accepts human rights complaint against UBS over private prison investments

In January 2024, BankTrack, the Coalition for Immigrant Freedom, and Worth Rises filed a complaint with the National Contact Point of Switzerland against Swiss-based bank UBS. The complaint alleges that the banks' financial involvement with private prison operators CoreCivic and GEO Group contravenes their responsibilities under the OECD Guidelines on Responsible Business Conduct. The Business & Human Rights Resource Centre previously invited CoreCivic and GeoGroup to respond to allegations made against them regarding alleged human rights violations in their private prison operations. Both companies responded to these allegations.

The NGOs have also filed complaints in the UK against the Swiss National Banks HSBC and Barclays.

In August 2024, the Swiss OECD National Contact Point accepted the human rights complaint against UBS over private prison investments. It has published its Initial Assessment of the complaint, and is offering its offices for mediation between UBS and the NGOs.

UBS argued that that there is “no direct link” between its operations and human rights violations, as the bank’s shares are not actively managed but rather are held in index funds. They also commented that they had engaged with index providers on human rights, including marked consultation led by the Principles for Responsible Investment (PRI), and had applied "controversial behaviour" exclusions to actively managed products.

プライバシー情報

このサイトでは、クッキーやその他のウェブストレージ技術を使用しています。お客様は、以下の方法でプライバシーに関する選択肢を設定することができます。変更は直ちに反映されます。

ウェブストレージの使用についての詳細は、当社の データ使用およびクッキーに関するポリシーをご覧ください

Strictly necessary storage

ON
OFF

Necessary storage enables core site functionality. This site cannot function without it, so it can only be disabled by changing settings in your browser.

クッキーのアナリティクス

ON
OFF

When you access our website we use Google Analytics to collect information on your visit. Accepting this cookie will allow us to understand more details about your journey, and improve how we surface information. All analytics information is anonymous and we do not use it to identify you. Google provides a Google Analytics opt-out add on for all popular browsers.

Promotional cookies

ON
OFF

We share news and updates on business and human rights through third party platforms, including social media and search engines. These cookies help us to understand the performance of these promotions.

本サイトにおけるお客様のプライバシーに関する選択

このサイトでは、必要なコア機能を超えてお客様の利便性を高めるために、クッキーやその他のウェブストレージ技術を使用しています。