abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfiltergenderglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptwitteruniversalityweb

このページは 日本語 では利用できません。English で表示されています

記事

2024年1月4日

著者:
Niina H. Farah, Politico

USA: Oklahoma district court orders removal of operating Osage Wind Farm turbines to protect Osage Nation’s sovereignty

Shutterstock (licensed)

"Tribal sovereignty trumps wind in Oklahoma", 4 Jan 2024

A federal judge has just done something usual — ordered the removal of an energy project that’s been generating power for nine years.

The December decision came as a shock even to the leaders of the Osage Nation, who have argued for more than a decade that the 84-turbine Osage Wind Farm interferes with the tribe’s mineral rights...

[Osage Minerals Council Chair Everett Waller] said the case against Osage Wind is about more than just being able to pursue fossil fuel leasing on the land beneath the turbines.

It’s about protecting the tribe’s ability to develop precious minerals, hydrogen power or carbon sequestration for future climate projects, he said.

“Our effort, not only will it protect the production side, but we’re looking at actually protection of our reservation for future generations,” Waller said. “That is really a huge effort.”

It’s rare for a court to remove an operating energy development. The Standing Rock tribe, for example, has unsuccessfully made a similar case against the Dakota Access pipeline.

The Oklahoma district court agreed that the wind farm had to go to protect the Osage Nation’s sovereignty. The project’s developers — Osage Wind, Enel Kansas and Enel Green Power North America — failed to get mining leases, despite digging up and crushing rocks to use as support for the turbines.

Leaving Osage Wind in place “would create the prospect for future interference with the Osage Mineral Council’s authority,” either from the project’s developers or anyone else interested in developing the mineral estate, the judge in the case wrote in her opinion in December.

The court ruling came after the Interior Department first sued the company for failing to get a mining approval for the project. The federal agency holds the minerals beneath the wind farm in trust for the Osage Nation.

The wind farm’s developers may still try to appeal the decision to remove the project, though their attorney did not respond to a request for comment on whether that was likely. Another hearing that hasn’t yet been set will decide how much they owe the Osage Nation for a decade of trespassing.

タイムライン

プライバシー情報

このサイトでは、クッキーやその他のウェブストレージ技術を使用しています。お客様は、以下の方法でプライバシーに関する選択肢を設定することができます。変更は直ちに反映されます。

ウェブストレージの使用についての詳細は、当社の データ使用およびクッキーに関するポリシーをご覧ください

Strictly necessary storage

ON
OFF

Necessary storage enables core site functionality. This site cannot function without it, so it can only be disabled by changing settings in your browser.

クッキーのアナリティクス

ON
OFF

When you access our website we use Google Analytics to collect information on your visit. Accepting this cookie will allow us to understand more details about your journey, and improve how we surface information. All analytics information is anonymous and we do not use it to identify you. Google provides a Google Analytics opt-out add on for all popular browsers.

Promotional cookies

ON
OFF

We share news and updates on business and human rights through third party platforms, including social media and search engines. These cookies help us to understand the performance of these promotions.

本サイトにおけるお客様のプライバシーに関する選択

このサイトでは、必要なコア機能を超えてお客様の利便性を高めるために、クッキーやその他のウェブストレージ技術を使用しています。