abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfiltergenderglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptwitteruniversalityweb

이 페이지는 한국어로 제공되지 않으며 English로 표시됩니다.

소송

2017년 7월 17일

California communities’ lawsuit against 37 fossil fuel companies (re climate change compensation)

상태: ONGOING

소송을 제기한 날짜
2017년 7월 17일
알 수 없음
Community
제소 위치: 미국
사건 위치: 미국
소송 유형: 국내

기업 페이지

bp 영국 석유, 가스 및 석탄
ConocoPhillips 미국 석유, 가스 및 석탄
Chevron 미국 석유, 가스 및 석탄
ExxonMobil 미국 석유, 가스 및 석탄
Eni 이탈리아 석유, 가스 및 석탄
Marathon Oil 미국 석유, 가스 및 석탄
Occidental Petroleum 미국 석유, 가스 및 석탄
Pemex 멕시코 석유, 가스 및 석탄
Shell plc 영국 석유, 가스 및 석탄
Equinor (formerly Statoil) 노르웨이 석유, 가스 및 석탄
TotalEnergies (formerly Total) 프랑스 석유, 가스 및 석탄, 에너지
Marathon Petroleum 미국 석유, 가스 및 석탄

출처

Snapshot: In 2017, three local governments in California filed a lawsuit against 37 fossil fueld companies, including BP, Chevron, ExxonMobil, and Shell. They allege defendants were aware of the impact of their greenhouse gas emissions on climate change and failed to act. They seek compensation for current and future costs of adapating to the consequences of climate change. The case is ongoing.

On 17 July 2017, three local governments in California (San Mateo County, Marin County, and the City of Imperial Beach) filed a lawsuit against 37 fossil fuel companies including BP, Chevron, ExxonMobil, Peabody Energy, Shell and Statoil.

They allege that the companies knew about the impacts of their greenhouse gas emissions on climate change and failed to act. They are seeking compensation for the current and future costs of adapting to the consequences of climate change, such as sea level rises.

According to Shell, climate change should be addressed through sound government policy and cultural change not by the courts. Statoil pointed out that previous lawsuits of this type had been dismissed for being a political, not a judicial, issue.

On 16 March 2018, a US District Court ruled that California state courts were the appropriate setting for the climate lawsuits.  The oil and gas companies targeted by the lawsuits had argued that the matter should be transfered to federal courts.  The companies have six weeks to appeal.

In May 2020, the 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the District Court's decision to remand the case to state courts.

타임라인