abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeblueskyburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfilterflaggenderglobeglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptwitteruniversalitywebwhatsappxIcons / Social / YouTube

이 페이지는 한국어로 제공되지 않으며 English로 표시됩니다.

이 내용은 다음 언어로도 제공됩니다: English, العربيّة

소송

Lafarge & Suez Cement lawsuit (re air pollution, Egypt)

상태: ONGOING

소송을 제기한 날짜
2016년 10월 3일
알 수 없음
Human rights group, Human Rights Defender
제소 위치: 이집트
사건 위치: 이집트
소송 유형: 국내

기업 페이지

LafargeHolcim 스위스 건축자재 및 장비

출처

.للنسخة العربية من ملف هذه القضية، رجاء الضغط هنا

Snapshot

On 3 October 2016, the Habi Center for Environmental Rights filed a lawsuit at the Egyptian Administrative Court challenging the use of coal by the cement companies Lafarge Egypt (part of LafargeHolcim) and the Suez Cement Group (part of HeidelbergCement). The Habi Center claimed that both companies had failed to disclose required environmental impact assessment studies or details on public hearings before they started using coal in their operations. It also claimed that by using coal without adhering to relevant regulations, the companies were violating the rights to health, healthy environment, participation and access to information, as enshrined in the Egyptian Constitution.  

Legal proceedings

On 3 October 2016, the Habi Center for Environmental Rights filed a case before the Egyptian Administrative Court of the Egyptian State Council based on Article 103 of the Egyptian Environment Law that allows any citizen or association concerned with the environment to seek judicial remedies in response to environmental law violations. They are challenging the use of coal by the cement companies Lafarge Egypt (part of LafargeHolcim) and the Suez Cement Group (part of HeidelbergCement). The Habi Center asked the Administrative Court to compel the government to suspend the license given to Lafarge Egypt and Suez Cement to use coal until they disclose their environmental impact assessment studies and details on relevant public hearings. The complaint also asked the Court to order both companies, as well as the Egyptian Environmental Affairs Agency, to systematically publish the results of public hearings and environmental impact studies on their respective websites.

Prior to commencing litigation, the Habi Center tried to communicate with both companies, as well as the Environmental Affairs Agency, but did not receive satisfactory responses. During the course of proceedings, the Habi Center closed, and the case is now being led by ElSeidi Law Firm.

In 2018, the Administrative Court issued a legal opinion in the form of a report stating that the plaintiffs are entitled to their request. It shows the existence of violations regarding the use of coal by the companies without implementing the necessary environmental requirements, especially the publication of an environmental impact assessment.

On 16 May 2020, the final hearing for the Lafarge and Suez Cement lawsuit took place. However, the Court decided to reopen the case on 29 August 2020 in order to give the companies the opportunity to make their pleading in court. They did not attend any session of the trial, despite being legally notified several times.

On 30 November 2020, the Administrative Judicial Court of the Egyptian State Council ruled that the case was inadmissible due to the absence of a negative administrative decision. The judge considered that the guidelines explaining how to conduct environmental impact assessments of any project in accordance with the environmental law are only procedures (not administrative decisions) and are not legally binding. They do not have any significant impact on the licensing process.

The plaintiffs have appealed the judgment.

- حابىيقدمطعنأماممجلسالدولةضدشركاتالأسمنتووزارةالبيئة,5 أكتوبر 2016، الكاتب: مركزحابيللحقوقالبيئية

Suez Cement
- "Response from Suez Cement", 23 Oct 2016

Habi Center for Environmental Rights
- “Habi lodges an appeal in Council State against cement companies and the Ministry of Environment”,  5 Oct 2016
- “Habi Centre awaits response from Egypt's Environmental Affairs Agency regarding cement companies”,  9 Aug 2016
- “Habi Center demands cement multinational companies to stop their violations and commit to local and international law”, 5 Oct 2015

타임라인

개인정보

이 웹사이트는 쿠키 및 기타 웹 저장 기술을 사용합니다. 아래에서 개인정보보호 옵션을 설정할 수 있습니다. 변경 사항은 즉시 적용됩니다.

웹 저장소 사용에 대한 자세한 내용은 다음을 참조하세요 데이터 사용 및 쿠키 정책

Strictly necessary storage

ON
OFF

Necessary storage enables core site functionality. This site cannot function without it, so it can only be disabled by changing settings in your browser.

분석 쿠키

ON
OFF

귀하가 우리 웹사이트를 방문하면 Google Analytics를 사용하여 귀하의 방문 정보를 수집합니다. 이 쿠키를 수락하면 저희가 귀하의 방문에 대한 자세한 내용을 이해하고, 정보 표시 방법을 개선할 수 있습니다. 모든 분석 정보는 익명이 보장되며 귀하를 식별하는데 사용하지 않습니다. Google은 모든 브라우저에 대해 Google Analytics 선택 해제 추가 기능을 제공합니다.

프로모션 쿠키

ON
OFF

우리는 소셜미디어와 검색 엔진을 포함한 제3자 플랫폼을 통해 기업과 인권에 대한 뉴스와 업데이트를 제공합니다. 이 쿠키는 이러한 프로모션의 성과를 이해하는데 도움이 됩니다.

이 사이트에 대한 개인정보 공개 범위 선택

이 사이트는 필요한 핵심 기능 이상으로 귀하의 경험을 향상시키기 위해 쿠키 및 기타 웹 저장 기술을 사용합니다.