abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfiltergenderglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptwitteruniversalityweb

Esta página não está disponível em Português e está sendo exibida em English

Ação judicial

17 Jul 2017

California communities’ lawsuit against 37 fossil fuel companies (re climate change compensation)

Status: ONGOING

Data em que a ação judicial foi iniciada
17 Jul 2017
Desconhecido
Comunidade
Local de Arquivamento: Estados Unidos da América
Localização do Incidente: Estados Unidos da América
Tipo de litígio: Doméstico

Empresas

bp Reino Unido Petróleo, gás e carvão
ConocoPhillips Estados Unidos da América Petróleo, gás e carvão
Chevron Estados Unidos da América Petróleo, gás e carvão
ExxonMobil Estados Unidos da América Petróleo, gás e carvão
Eni Itália Petróleo, gás e carvão
Marathon Oil Estados Unidos da América Petróleo, gás e carvão
Occidental Petroleum Estados Unidos da América Petróleo, gás e carvão
Pemex México Petróleo, gás e carvão
Shell plc Reino Unido Petróleo, gás e carvão
Equinor (formerly Statoil) Noruega Petróleo, gás e carvão
TotalEnergies (formerly Total) França Petróleo, gás e carvão, Energia
Marathon Petroleum Estados Unidos da América Petróleo, gás e carvão

Fontes

Snapshot: In 2017, three local governments in California filed a lawsuit against 37 fossil fueld companies, including BP, Chevron, ExxonMobil, and Shell. They allege defendants were aware of the impact of their greenhouse gas emissions on climate change and failed to act. They seek compensation for current and future costs of adapating to the consequences of climate change. The case is ongoing.

On 17 July 2017, three local governments in California (San Mateo County, Marin County, and the City of Imperial Beach) filed a lawsuit against 37 fossil fuel companies including BP, Chevron, ExxonMobil, Peabody Energy, Shell and Statoil.

They allege that the companies knew about the impacts of their greenhouse gas emissions on climate change and failed to act. They are seeking compensation for the current and future costs of adapting to the consequences of climate change, such as sea level rises.

According to Shell, climate change should be addressed through sound government policy and cultural change not by the courts. Statoil pointed out that previous lawsuits of this type had been dismissed for being a political, not a judicial, issue.

On 16 March 2018, a US District Court ruled that California state courts were the appropriate setting for the climate lawsuits.  The oil and gas companies targeted by the lawsuits had argued that the matter should be transfered to federal courts.  The companies have six weeks to appeal.

In May 2020, the 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the District Court's decision to remand the case to state courts.

Linha do tempo