abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfiltergenderglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptwitteruniversalityweb

这页面没有简体中文版本,现以English显示

文章

2011年1月28日

作者:
John Ruggie, UN Special Representative for Business and Human Rights

[PDF] [Response to letter by Arvind Ganesan, Human Rights Watch to Financial Times re draft Guiding Principles]

查看所有标签
While AI and others have been busy writing letters justifying their indefensible advice to the UN Human Rights Council, Amnesty UK has been busy “urging” the UK Commons Select Committee on Business, Innovation and Skills to adopt the very proposals that Amnesty’s International Secretariat finds so inadequate...AI-UK clearly believes that policy is an important instrument for inducing change in the behavior of corporates. In contrast, the AI-Secretariat and Human Rights Watch reiterate their belief that only a binding international treaty will do...My aim, as I have stated explicitly from the beginning, is to reduce corporate related human rights harm to the maximum extent possible in the shortest possible period of time.

时间线