abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfiltergenderglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptwitteruniversalityweb

このページは 日本語 では利用できません。English で表示されています

記事

2006年12月1日

著者:
Ethical Trading Action Group (ETAG)

[PDF] full report: "Revealing Clothing - 2006 Transparency Report Card"

[Each company was evaluated against a total of 20 criteria spread among five categories: Governance and risk management, Code for labour standards, Stakeholder engagement, Management, Supply chain auditing and reporting. The 30 companies surveyed (with total score out of 100 in brackets) were: Levi Strauss (78), Reebok (part of Adidas-Salomon) (77), Mountain Equipment (74), Adidas (73), Gap (71), Nike (68), H&M (64), Eddie Bauer (63), Liz Clairborne (62), Zara (part of Inditex) (49), HBC (48), American Eagle Outfitters (40), Wal-Mart (40), Mark’s Work Wearhouse (39), Winners (TJX) (36), Roots (27), La Senza (23), Lululemon (18), Sears (8), Northern Group (6), Reitmans (6), Polo Ralph Lauren (5), Boutique Jacob (0), Forzani (0), Grafton-Fraser (0), Harry Rosen (0), International Clothiers (0), Le Chateau (0), Tristan & America (0), YM Inc. (0)]