abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfiltergenderglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptwitteruniversalityweb

这页面没有简体中文版本,现以English显示

文章

2006年12月1日

作者:
Ethical Trading Action Group (ETAG)

[PDF] full report: "Revealing Clothing - 2006 Transparency Report Card"

[Each company was evaluated against a total of 20 criteria spread among five categories: Governance and risk management, Code for labour standards, Stakeholder engagement, Management, Supply chain auditing and reporting. The 30 companies surveyed (with total score out of 100 in brackets) were: Levi Strauss (78), Reebok (part of Adidas-Salomon) (77), Mountain Equipment (74), Adidas (73), Gap (71), Nike (68), H&M (64), Eddie Bauer (63), Liz Clairborne (62), Zara (part of Inditex) (49), HBC (48), American Eagle Outfitters (40), Wal-Mart (40), Mark’s Work Wearhouse (39), Winners (TJX) (36), Roots (27), La Senza (23), Lululemon (18), Sears (8), Northern Group (6), Reitmans (6), Polo Ralph Lauren (5), Boutique Jacob (0), Forzani (0), Grafton-Fraser (0), Harry Rosen (0), International Clothiers (0), Le Chateau (0), Tristan & America (0), YM Inc. (0)]