abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfiltergenderglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptwitteruniversalityweb

Diese Seite ist nicht auf Deutsch verfügbar und wird angezeigt auf English

NGO-Erwiderung

6 Okt 2016

Autor:
Public Eye (Switzerland)

Reply to Puma Energy response to the Dirty Diesel report

...Fuel distributors profit from weak specifications because they allow them to import fuels at lower prices because cheap blendstocks were used to make these fuels. We are surprised to hear that Puma Energy claims to have no control over its supply chain. If fuel supplies are indeed commingled and, Puma Energy isn’t in a position to vary fuel quality, how can they advertise that they sell quality fuels, as they do on their website: “Puma Energy is an empowering energy business: Supplying affordable, high quality products in 47 countries across five continents.”...

Zeitleiste