abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfiltergenderglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptwitteruniversalityweb

このページは 日本語 では利用できません。English で表示されています

NGOの反論

2016年10月6日

著者:
Public Eye (Switzerland)

Reply to Puma Energy response to the Dirty Diesel report

全てのタグを見る

...Fuel distributors profit from weak specifications because they allow them to import fuels at lower prices because cheap blendstocks were used to make these fuels. We are surprised to hear that Puma Energy claims to have no control over its supply chain. If fuel supplies are indeed commingled and, Puma Energy isn’t in a position to vary fuel quality, how can they advertise that they sell quality fuels, as they do on their website: “Puma Energy is an empowering energy business: Supplying affordable, high quality products in 47 countries across five continents.”...

タイムライン