abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfiltergenderglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptwitteruniversalityweb

這頁面沒有繁體中文版本,現以English顯示

非政府組織回答

2016年10月6日

作者:
Public Eye (Switzerland)

Reply to Puma Energy response to the Dirty Diesel report

查看所有標籤

...Fuel distributors profit from weak specifications because they allow them to import fuels at lower prices because cheap blendstocks were used to make these fuels. We are surprised to hear that Puma Energy claims to have no control over its supply chain. If fuel supplies are indeed commingled and, Puma Energy isn’t in a position to vary fuel quality, how can they advertise that they sell quality fuels, as they do on their website: “Puma Energy is an empowering energy business: Supplying affordable, high quality products in 47 countries across five continents.”...

時間線